Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimmer\s+test\s+to\s+shut\s+down\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer test to shut down (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:07:42 -0400
It appears that interest in the Skimmer/Telnet test has pretty much tapered off, so I will probably shut it down after this weekend. I do want to see how it does with the heavy volume of a busy conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00336.html (7,478 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer test to shut down (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:02:16 -0400
That's because everyone is talking about it here, what they think it is and will do and not trying it. Hank K8DD -- 'Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with ex
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00350.html (7,707 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer test to shut down (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Stockton <n5dx2005@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
I was hoping someone would bring this up. I've emailed the Russian DX committee a couple of times, but never received a response. Is it a sure thing that Skimmer is allowed during the Russian contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00353.html (9,194 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer test to shut down (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:56:15 +0000
I haven't watched it in the last week or so, but I would think it would be rather hard to copy exchanges the way it puts out the spots. I would also not trust it for 100% copy of calls, or to be fast
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00362.html (11,382 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer test to shut down (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:44:54 +0500
Kevin, I am not speaking on behalf of RDXC committee. Just my own opinion. In order for any QSO to be counted as valid both, a call sign and control number have to be recorded in the log. I suppose y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00366.html (11,270 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer test to shut down (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:49:55 +0100
Just run N1MM Logger, connected to N4ZR Skimmer for the first time with a great delight! There are plenty of USA DXC spots thanks to M/M giants but not enough from EU or JA. I just got 1 kW from my G
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00374.html (7,871 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer test to shut down (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:12:10 -0700
Hank, K8DD, replied: I decided to give the Skimmer test a go before Pete pulled the plug. Following Pete's instructions, I connected to the packet Telnet address, opened a Bandmap window in WriteLog
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00382.html (9,484 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer test to shut down (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:18:51 +0100
This Robot and Skimmer stuff is almost too much. Me and a friend is right now talking about making my radio station much larger, more towers and towers up to 200 ft, 80m Yagi etc etc. However I´m sta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00384.html (8,197 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer test to shut down (score: 1)
Author: Scott Pederson <spederson@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Re-posted to all, Good morning! The EXACT same thing is happening in the computer gaming industry. It used to be games where player1 vs. player 2, that evolved into massive online gaming with many us
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00394.html (9,193 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu