Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Spoofed\s+spots\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 10:12:49 -0500
I'm really surprised at the apparent disregard for VE7CC's report of spoofed spots and spoofed self-spots during CQWWCW, all seemingly traced to a single IP in Italy.  After the first time this happe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00020.html (8,306 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: John Dorr <cqk1ar@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 12:17:58 -0500
Pete et al, We have continued to pursue this but have not closed on a specific individual. While the identified IP is in Italy, the actual end-user has proven to be well hidden behind a VPN or other
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00022.html (10,044 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 21:18:36 -0500
Hello Pete What makes you think that nothing is being done? Do not worry. Be assured that the CQWW committee has this and many other issues well in hand 73 Tim K3LR I'm really surprised at the appare
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00027.html (9,020 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 21:46:45 -0500
Sorry, Tim, but I think a lot of us have a legitimate interest in seeing this solved, and being patted on the hand and told to sit down and be quiet doesn't go over well with me.  I got a status repo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00029.html (9,750 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 18:28:38 +0000
This problem cannot be solved without adding some level of authentication to the spotting system. Right now anyone can spot anything using any call. The WW Committee lacks subpoena power so it may no
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00031.html (14,702 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 11:55:19 -0700
Let's put things in perspective. Multi-billion dollar corporations can't stop Rachel from Cardholder Services. How are we going to stop this? Barry W2UP ______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00032.html (15,869 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 15:37:20 -0500
I agree, but doubt that a properly secure spotting network will happen in my lifetime. As I implied, I'm hoping that the culprit will find it necessary to boast about his exploits, and someone will t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00034.html (15,259 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 15:26:09 -0600
How does the ARRL validate the authenticity of the data uploaded to LoTW? Same method could be applied here. The network should only allow trafic from users who have completed KYC, and authenticate w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00035.html (17,695 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 11:33:41 +0100
From the sideline: Do will still speak about a hobby or are we close to bring in FBI and the likes for spot fraud investigations? 73, Chris DL8MBS Am 04.12.2021 um 22:26 schrieb Martin, LU5DX: How do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00037.html (9,570 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Hans Brakob <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 21:21:45 +0000
Chris, its way more important than that. Interpol is needed. And on site detectives at all our stations. 73, de Hans, KØHB Just a Boy and his Radio ________________________________ From: CQ-Contest <
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00039.html (10,438 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Hans Brakob <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 21:28:22 +0000
And if you do catch her, what will you do? Take away her birthday? 73, de Hans, KØHB Just a Boy and his Radio ________________________________ From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+kzerohb=gmail.com@c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00040.html (16,523 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Charles Gallo <charlie@thegallos.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 17:30:37 -0500
And what, exactly prevents people from running an unauthorized spotting network not controlled by the authorities -- 73 de KG2V Charlie _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00042.html (19,181 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Jack Brindle via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 16:39:59 -0600
Isnt that the way it is supposed to be? Remember, the spotting system was created so that hams could alert other hams as to the availability of DX or other special stations. We contesters discovered
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00044.html (18,257 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 19:17:20 -0500
I have no idea how any manual internet spots are of any value whatsoever on CW. If you call CQ you are instantly spotted by every skimmer in the world who detects your signal. You are essentially sel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00045.html (10,907 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 16:43:23 -0800
I wasn't active at the time, but I've been told on good authority that the spotting network was developed BY the contesting community, not the DX community. 73, Jim K9YC _____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00046.html (9,412 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 21:36:55 -0500
Does nobody remember, just a few years ago, that the CQWW Committee dispatched observers to physically look over the shoulders of top-scoring ops.  Fortunately, once was enough.  Also, let's not over
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00048.html (12,627 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 03:18:35 +0000 (UTC)
First and last comment on the issue: I don't like the spoofed spots any more than the next ham.   But you do all realize that the discord that this discussion has generated is exactly the type of dis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00049.html (10,004 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 21:27:35 -0600
I liked it better when the FBI was going to look into it. Chuck W5PR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00050.html (11,176 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Jack Brindle via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 22:44:46 -0600
I _was_ there, very active in the creation of packet radio and its uses. There is a reason the software system was named DX Cluster. We carried a lot of DX Cluster packets on the GRAPES 56K network b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00051.html (10,447 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Spots (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 06:02:00 -0500
A goodly number of users out there have skimmer spots turned off and only rely on "human" spots. 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00052.html (12,058 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu