Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Technology\s+against\s+cheating\?\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? (score: 1)
Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@adinet.com.uy>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:42:09 -0300
Hi Rich, great about that, sorry I didnīt noticed it when you post it. But really this is a big problem. 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W --Mensaje original-- De: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00243.html (11,030 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? (score: 1)
Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@adinet.com.uy>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:42:09 -0300
you are going for a top place in SOAB unassisted? If yes, I donīt think you will allow a friend call. But if anyway he call you, just tell him you are unassisted and donīt want to know where to find
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00244.html (10,682 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? (score: 1)
Author: <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:24:32 -0700
If your operation meets the requirements of the claimed category, why would you NOT chose to enter the category most advantageous to you? For example, if I find that I've had a really super weekend o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00245.html (11,648 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:08:01 -0500
Hans, In your example, there's nothing ethically wrong. There have been cases, however, where a competitive entrant in the Single Op *Unassisted* category has found that he did not win, saw that ther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00247.html (13,295 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? (score: 1)
Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@adinet.com.uy>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:23:43 -0300
so you see that another Station win you in SOAB and you decided to send single band 40? Really I donīt do that... Of course will be many exceptions... 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W --Mensaje original-- De: kz
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00248.html (12,559 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Treas, K8GT" <k8gt@mi.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:19:13 -0400
But suppose that I enter as Low Power. During the contest, I decide to operate High Power. I'd have to change it, or just forget about it and not enter, and maybe not enter many others. 73, Gerry, K8
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00249.html (11,508 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:47:08 -0700
Really? All these years I thought that log checking was done to catch (and penalize) errors. Dave AB7E _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00250.html (8,868 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:46:40 -0500 (CDT)
I think there's a big difference between changing your power level during a contest... or changing from a MS to SO because the other op couldn't make it, or SO to MS or even MM because another op sho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00252.html (10,573 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? (score: 1)
Author: <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:27:53 -0700
Please don't put words in my mouth. My example was intended to show a completely legitimate reason why a person might not wish to designate his category until after the competition. I don't see any s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00253.html (13,489 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? (score: 1)
Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
One idea to deal with "entry category shopping": have the contest sponsor automatically enter each submitted log in every category it was eligible for (based on number of operators, allowable power,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00264.html (9,792 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:35:09 +0200
K5ZD wrote: The experience of the journey is far more important than the place in the standings. I couldn't agree more visiting Tunisia after yasmine revolution! My YU friends explained me WPX M/S ru
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00276.html (8,739 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:00:18 +0600
Mario, New rules do not exclude octopus at all. They give the edge to those MS who have separate antennas to operate multiple stations on the same band. Another issue is power limit. 3V8SS says the p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00279.html (9,848 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:40:16 +0200
I only wish old mults only rule for M/S is returned especially in forthcoming improved propagations. OC Hrane, YT1AD of 3V8BB fame has been visiting Tunisia often since 1990s, developed special relat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00304.html (10,960 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu