Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+UBN\s+call\s+confirmed\s+by\s+LOTW\s+\?\!\?\!\?\!\!\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] UBN call confirmed by LOTW ?!?!?!!? (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:00:25 -0400
Just got my UBN report for CQWW CW....I had a -B for 8P1A 40m ( if I read it correctly 36 other logs claimed him/her also)...lost the mult plus the points/penalty. Being curious I checked LOTW and sa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00162.html (7,081 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN call confirmed by LOTW ?!?!?!!? (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
OO!!... I am gonna check all my "BAD" QSO's today in LOTW, very interesting... 73's Andrei EW1AR-NP3D-V49A 73, Jamie WW3S _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00165.html (8,107 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN call confirmed by LOTW ?!?!?!!? (score: 1)
Author: Tim Duffy K3LR <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:02:53 -0500
Hi Jamie! 8P1A and 8P5A are callsigns used by W2SC during CQWW 2005 8P1A was used on phone for CQWW by W2SC 8P5A was used for CQWW CW by W2SC 8P1A is a busted call for CQWW CW (spotted busted on the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00166.html (8,407 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN call confirmed by LOTW ?!?!?!!? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:53:37 -0700
Jamie, If you worked 8P1A in CQWW CW, it was probably 8P5A instead, and therefore a busted call. 8P5A was in the CW test, 8P1A was in the SSB test. 8P5A submitted a log for CW, 8P1A submitted one for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00167.html (8,447 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN call confirmed by LOTW ?!?!?!!? (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 16:12:37 -0400
my mistake guys...the LOTW listing is for the qso, not the qsl...it is NOT confirmed in LOTW....my bad... _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00168.html (9,391 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN call confirmed by LOTW ?!?!?!!? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:48:54 -0500
Hi Jamie, B doesn't penalize folk who worked someone who didn't submit a log, B and N should only penalize when a cross-referencing of logs provides clear evidence something went wrong. There are thr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00169.html (9,414 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN call confirmed by LOTW ?!?!?!!? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 22:30:11 +0000
I have several -B QSOs in my log that I listened to the audio clip and it is CLEAR the call I copied was correct as received and the station cfm'd the report. (Sh) it happens :.) I also have at least
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00170.html (8,939 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN call confirmed by LOTW ?!?!?!!? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:12:28 -0400
This is not meant to pick on Jamie... The fact that 36 logs worked 8P1A in CQWW CW probably just means that 35 people jumped on the incorrect 8P1A cluster spot, and didn't take the time and effort to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00171.html (8,689 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN call confirmed by LOTW ?!?!?!!? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 22:09:53 -0400
I had this happen last year with EA1WX - 80m QSO was confirmed by LoTW, but it was a NIL contact in the adjudication. Weird. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a tho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00172.html (8,437 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN call confirmed by LOTW ?!?!?!!? (score: 1)
Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 12:48:58 -0400
Not to play "can you top this", but I received a direct QSL card from a station for which our 40m QSO in CQWW SSB 2005 was a -N! I sent a note to K3EST, who had the other guy's log rechecked, my 40m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00174.html (9,797 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN call confirmed by LOTW ?!?!?!!? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 19:54:22 -0500
Contester #1: Contester #2: Contester #3: One realistic conclusion: the contest log checking system may be working right after all. Mark, N5OT _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00179.html (8,686 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu