Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Vista\s+OS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Vista\s+OS\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vista OS (score: 1): Author: Neal Campbell <nealk3nc@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:10:52 -0400; Personally (and I don't say this because I sell computers) I would avoid them all. Why get twice the bloat of an XP system when you can buy an XP system? Neal Campbell Abroham Neal Software Programmi; /archives//html/WriteLog/2009-08/msg00016.html (8,830 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vista OS (score: 1): Author: <k8gt@mi.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:58:27 -0400; Current wisdom is avoid all versions. :-( Actually I bought a 2.2 GHz Pentium Dual Core built by Systemax in Ohio from Tiger Direct and it came with Vist Home Basic. That's the one that according to; /archives//html/WriteLog/2009-08/msg00017.html (8,727 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vista OS (score: 1): Author: Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 10:00:20 -0400; 1)It's NOT twice the bloat - particularly for Win7 2)More modern UI 3)That dreaded UAC does a lot to prevent trojans - it's the equivalent of the Unix SU - and they made it a better in Win7 4)The dri; /archives//html/WriteLog/2009-08/msg00018.html (8,186 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]