Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WB6D\s+\-\s+Improved\s+KT34XAs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WB6D\s+\-\s+Improved\s+KT34XAs\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WB6D - Improved KT34XAs (score: 1): Author: Martin LU5DX <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>; Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 20:40:29 -0300; Hi all, Does anybody remember WB6D? He once told me during a QSO he was using a stack of "Improved" KT34XAs. According to what he described he had added one more director to the original KT34XAs. Doe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00082.html (6,919 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WB6D - Improved KT34XAs (score: 1): Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:46:54 +0700; I am guessing this is the product of the original 34xa mfg when they made and sold an enhanced version.... that would be KLM. Check old KLM adverts. Charly -- Charly, HS0ZCW _________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00193.html (8,117 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WB6D - Improved KT34XAs (score: 1): Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:05:36 -0500; Back in the day, KLM made the KT-34A tribander, which had four tri-band, trapped elements, and the KT-34XA tribander which had a longer boom with five tri-band, trapped elements and and extra monoban; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00227.html (8,973 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WB6D - Improved KT34XAs (score: 1): Author: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:35:32 +0000; There was/is the KT36XA from M2 http://www.m2inc.com/upgrade-kit-kt34xa-to-kt36xa/ 73 Peter SM2CEW At 09:05 2017-03-10, David Pruett wrote: Back in the day, KLM made the KT-34A tribander, which had f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00255.html (9,826 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] WB6D - Improved KT34XAs (score: 1): Author: Martin Monsalvo - LU5DX <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:00:22 -0300; Hi Dave, What WB6D had done, was to extend the boom and add a sixth tribander element. The details remain unknown to me. He had a pair of those modified KT34XAs and his singals from 10 to 20 were rea; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00260.html (10,314 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WB6D - Improved KT34XAs (score: 1): Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:50:52 -0400; The KT36XA has the same number of elements in the same configuration as the KT34XA with the same boom length. It is not a significantly different antenna. The "upgrade kit" replaces components in the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00295.html (11,422 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] WB6D - Improved KT34XAs (score: 1): Author: Martin Monsalvo - LU5DX <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>; Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:58:58 -0300; Right on David! 73, Martin LU5DX Enviado desde BlueMail _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00304.html (12,560 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] WB6D - Improved KT34XAs (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:50:14 -0600; The KT-36XA upgrade kit is a huge mechanical improvement over the old KT-34XA. All of the aluminum straps have been replaced with CNC-machined aluminum brackets. No more intermittancies ! A few of th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00313.html (14,397 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]