Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+Contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+Contest\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WPX CONTEST (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T. A. Russell); Date: Sun Mar 23 06:50:11 1997; Wouldn't it be nice to have a prefix contest where all prefixes are created equal? Unfortunately, the CQ WPX contest has this ridiculous country bias where contacts in your own country are ZERO point; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00308.html (8,454 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] WPX CONTEST (score: 1): Author: n4vj@contesting.com (Bill Fisher, N4VJ / K4AAA); Date: Sun Mar 23 09:01:38 1997; No way. Then a W5 or W6 might win the contest and we couldn't have that. The W1's gotta have a contest to win to you know! Afterall the W6's have.... what.... SS Phone? That should keep em happy. Se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00309.html (8,298 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest (score: 1): Author: floydjr@interpath.com (Jimmy R. Floyd); Date: Sun Mar 23 10:23:32 1997; Let me first say that I agree with N4KG 100%. NO Contest should have zero points for a contact. Everyone should be worth something even if it is only one point. If you want to make it better to work; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00313.html (10,835 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest (score: 1): Author: n8yys@juno.com (Roy S Maull); Date: Sun Mar 23 17:54:40 1997; -- < SNIP> -- For all the "little pistol" and "water pistol" stations, changing the rules would allow us to at least build some kind of score. It will never be what the "big guns" shoot down, but we; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00317.html (11,059 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Sun Mar 23 14:41:35 1997; QSL on zero points no good in WPX! Now is the time to modify the rules for WPX contests. We are at the bottom of the sunspot (record) cycle. If scoring system is adjusted in such way that scores with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00319.html (8,409 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest (score: 1): Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough); Date: Sun Mar 23 13:48:22 1997; Except it should go back to the 30-hour format. Obviously this experiment of making it a 36 hour contest in order to promote more single-op DXpeditions has proven to be a bust. It's time to for the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00320.html (8,079 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Sun Mar 23 21:43:56 1997; Strong YES to move CW part to April and we will have double that many happy contesters. Steve N8BJQ: Pretty Please!! P.S. Looking for good radio? Signal One is back and guess what they use as a a bas; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00324.html (8,215 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest (score: 1): Author: temurto@kauha.kauhajoki.fi (Teijo Murtovaara); Date: Mon Mar 24 10:02:52 1997; I strongly agree with that. The change into 36-hour format made it very difficult to compete with the south of europe from Finland (and other nordic countries) because our openings are much shorter a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00329.html (9,340 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest (score: 1): Author: k5zd@ultranet.com (Randy Thompson); Date: Mon Mar 24 19:08:55 1997; I agree with Yuri's suggested scoring below. The USA records would be most affected since lots of zero pointers would become something. Perhaps JA would also benefit in this regard. The EU scores wou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00344.html (8,138 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest (score: 1): Author: VK1FF@contesting.com (VK1FF); Date: Fri Mar 21 01:01:49 1997; I would not be in favor of increasing the point value for same country contacts. Many contesters down here already feel the scoring (read multipliers) encourages too much intra-country and intra-cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00349.html (8,226 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T. A. Russell); Date: Tue Mar 25 08:13:31 1997; Jim I respectfully disagree. Are you suggesting that no one should work fellow countrymen for multipliers, or even same continent contacts in the WPX contest? Don't hold your breath! I'm just asking; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00350.html (9,922 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest (score: 1): Author: sergiobg@br.homeshopping.com.br (Sergio Botelho Guimaraes); Date: Tue Mar 25 17:08:00 1997; QSL on zero points no good in WPX! Now is the time to modify the rules for WPX contests. We are at the bottom of the sunspot (record) cycle. If scoring system is adjusted in such way that scores with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00360.html (9,064 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest (score: 1): Author: MartinL@appdes.com.au (Martin Luther); Date: Mon Mar 24 10:21:05 1997; Zero Points I am not sure that it would be such a good idea to award points for intra country contacts. With double points for low band contacts it could turn this DX contest into just another US dom; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00416.html (8,678 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest (score: 1): Author: VK1FF@contesting.com (VK1FF / WB2FFY); Date: Sun Mar 30 22:52:20 1997; Tom (N4KG), For many, the title "CQ World-Wide WPX [CW/SSB] Contest" suggests a "DX" contest. But, technically I guess your right. ^^^^^^^^^^^ Interestingly, several have suggested that this contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00430.html (10,697 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest (score: 1): Author: MartinL@appdes.com.au (Martin Luther); Date: Mon Mar 24 10:21:05 1997; Zero Points I am not sure that it would be such a good idea to award points for intra country contacts. With double points for low band contacts it could turn this DX contest into just another US dom; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00449.html (8,567 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] WPX Contest (score: 1): Author: MartinL@appdes.com.au (Martin Luther); Date: Mon Mar 24 10:21:05 1997; Zero Points I am not sure that it would be such a good idea to award points for intra country contacts. With double points for low band contacts it could turn this DX contest into just another US dom; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00453.html (8,461 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]