Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRTC\s+Qualifying\s*$/: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC qualifying (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:54:56 -0500
Its actually amazing that we are even able to try qualifying. For half of WRTC history, getting into the competition was a popularity contest. There was no qualifying.you were "sponsored". Now if we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00149.html (7,270 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC qualifying (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:01:21 -0800 (PST)
In the last WRTC one of the WØ players was from Eastern Europe via Spain.  How many Black Hole contest clubs do you think will be sponsors of the next WRTC gig in DL? __73, de Hans, K0HB "Just a Boy
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00159.html (7,815 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC qualifying (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:47:42 -0800
I thought my idea of some years ago had "merit", but as I appeared to be the only one - it didn't fly too far. In essence: Your two man team plunks down 5000 Euros (too much?? too little??) and you'v
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00179.html (9,655 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC qualifying (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:41:47 -0500
Too little for what the event has become. But it really depends on the equipment and amenities provided, as well as the number of teams. Portable toilets that people won't complain about cost a lot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00192.html (7,911 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC qualifying (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 22:51:28 -0500
Jim, As I suspect you well know, there WERE four financed teams at WRTC2014 and there are spots for five at WRTC2018. And they certainly were as competitive as the other teams, capturing place number
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00196.html (8,845 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Marv Bloomquist <n5aw@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:10:05 -0500
Lots of discussion about this topic - as a previous competitor and referee here's my take. Short of reducing it to a computer program there is really no practical way to make the qualifying criteria
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00131.html (8,839 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Carol Richards <n2mm@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 17:52:26 -0400
Hi, I agree....where you operate _from_ should determine what region you compete in. A W6 in California operating a remote station on the East coast should not be grouped with other East coast statio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00032.html (6,785 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hurlbut <chriskl9a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 19:11:55 -0600
Has anyone qualified for WRTC operating remotely? -Chris KL9A _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/lis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00037.html (7,345 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 23:56:56 -0400
A W6 ham resident in California that operates a station on the east coast, whether by physical or remote means, could not qualify to be a team leader for the WRTC2018. Rule 7.5 - 7.7, subject to Rule
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00038.html (7,802 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Fabio via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 10:15:24 +0200 (CEST)
I have equipments to remotely qualify for WRTC (thanks to WW2DX and W2RE that experienced RHR with me some years ago) but have not time and need antenna repairs. My idea? To transfer the station to L
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00040.html (9,608 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 16:16:41 -0400
A west coast ham, operating a remote station with antennas in Maine, should be competing as if he/she were physically in Maine. Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00045.html (8,486 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Jim via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:45:48 -0400
I have a somewhat different perspective, being an Ohio snowbird who spends half the year in Florida. As a practical matter I could not qualify without a lot of travel or remote operating from W8. And
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00048.html (10,536 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 18:36:54 -0300
WRTC is not truly the 'Olympics of Ham Radio' in that the most skilled fellas are not necessarily those 52 (or whatever) teams out on the field. Half of those on the field are chosen Teammates (and m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00049.html (7,984 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Coker via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 03:11:22 +0000 (UTC)
I think whats most interesting is the guys I know who typically win dont spend a lot of time complaining... they spend a lot of time working at what makes them winners. I can also think of some peopl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00050.html (12,510 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 17:03:56 +0200
Good points Tim. 73, Maarten PD2R Op za 7 jul. 2018 om 15:55 schreef Timothy Coker via CQ-Contest < cq-contest@contesting.com> _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00055.html (13,622 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 13:03:49 -0400
It's possible to qualify by doing low power. Your score would be compared to others that are doing low power and not the high power scores. If you do that you won't have to compete again the "big gun
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00057.html (13,684 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Igor Sokolov <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 02:16:10 +0500
Yes, this was the first time one could qualify using low power. Notwithstanding you have to have big antenna farm because even in Low power category there were a lot of competitors. And yes, some of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00058.html (15,204 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Coker via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 21:38:43 +0000 (UTC)
What if you had no home station, let alone a tribander with wires, could you qualify then? Tim / N6WIN Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone Yes, this was the first time one could qualify using low power.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00059.html (16,800 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 18:42:27 -0300
Not only that. A whole lot of "Category hopping" took place to avoid the competition. WRTC is fantastic, and it would be even more so, if certain detrimental factors were eliminated from the qualifyi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00060.html (17,540 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 20:30:14 -0400
6. Qualification Score Calculation The qualification score is the sum of up to 12 Event Scores. The maximum possible qualification score is 12.000 for DL, 11.900 for the rest of the world. 1. A maxim
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00061.html (16,919 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu