Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+You\s+gotta\s+let\s+me\s+know\,\s+should\s+M\/M\s+Distributed\s+stay\s+or\s+go\.\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go. (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 21:25:40 -0300
It should certainly be established as a permanent category for sure. Vy 73, Martín, LU5DX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00046.html (9,733 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go. (score: 1)
Author: sbloom@acsalaska.net
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 22:53:39 -0400
<Begin pompous diatribe> Hi Jeff, Naaah, I would not make that assumption.  This is all speculation, and a bit of curiosity on my end on where people's heads are, regarding this.  Obviously, I didn't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00048.html (15,488 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go. (score: 1)
Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 03:17:57 +0000
My vote is: If it increases the fun, do it. While I understand the logic of the argument "it reduces the number of available stations to work", that argument relies on the assumption that participant
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00049.html (10,099 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go. (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 12:56:07 +0100
The same argument could be made for ANY remote operation, Yes, that's my point. and you are most definitely swimming upstream (and mostly alone) on that. It's definitely a struggle :-) And in spite
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00052.html (17,455 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go. (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 10:54:46 -0500
The question and many of the responses treat this topic as though all stations and all groups of operators are the same, but they aren't the same! If there are 6 serious ops with their own home stati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00057.html (12,523 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go. (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 13:37:27 -0700
Perhaps it's worth another try at offering a solution....this battle has become the 100 Years War. Instead of "Multi" classifications, consider treating entries involving more than one operator as a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00058.html (10,217 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go. (score: 1)
Author: AB1J via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 00:45:10 +0000 (UTC)
This is a nice idea but I think teams should be allowed to either use a single call or individual calls.  One or the other in any given contest.   And I fail to see how the M/M Distributed category c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00060.html (11,952 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go. (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:15:56 -0400
I just don't get why this M/M Distributed category is taking up so much bandwidth on the reflector. There were only about 11 entries posted on 3830. Not exactly a game changer that effected the major
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00064.html (12,387 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go. (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 10:32:04 -0500
here were only 21 M/M Distributed stations that have loaded their CQ WPX CW logs so I agree that in only has a minimal effect on the available stations to work. If the ops have fun in that category i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00066.html (9,463 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go. (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 12:53:34 -0400
This has been an issue with me since I first began contesting. The guys with Tri-band antennas can rotate their antenna at the push os a button, but I have to go out and manually move 100 foot pines
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00070.html (10,276 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go. (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 18:20:00 -0400
I would have a lot more fun in contests if there was a WIRES-ONLY category and I could compete for something. Hey CQ can you create a category for me too?  I doubt I would even get a response from th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00074.html (10,629 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go. (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 22:49:44 -0300
Hi Jeff, Actually, after some time in this hobby of ours, you would get more enjoyment if not competing for anything at all. Thankfully, that is what around 95% of the entrants do. Those are the ones
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00076.html (11,293 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu