Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ZEROLAND\s+QSO\s+PARTY\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: ZEROLAND QSO PARTY <radioham@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:11:50 -0600
"ZQP" Zeroland QSO Party Homepage ~Updated November 11th,2010~ The Contest which allows everyone to work everyone... Sponsored by the *Iowa Wireless Contest Club. * <http://www.w0iw.com/> *"ZQP" Zero
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00246.html (12,630 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 08:24:23 -0600
I read about this contest yesterday someplace. I do not remember where. The was something in the other announcement that is NOT in this announcement, but one thing I read there was something I found
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00247.html (16,660 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: "Milt, N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 09:46:24 -0700
I read about this contest yesterday someplace. I do not remember where. The was something in the other announcement that is NOT in this announcement, but one thing I read there was something I found
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00248.html (8,186 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 10:01:50 -0800
The posted rules (which you quoted) do NOT allow WARC band use. Any use of WARC bands for contesting would be a really BAD idea on several levels. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy and his radio" --
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00249.html (8,966 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 11:43:43 -0600
Wow, Did I get slammed on that posting.!! Only a couple politely said no via the list here, but the direct E-Mails, wow! Don't Shoot the messenger dudes!! And I know I seen this someplace, and here i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00250.html (10,869 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 11:48:54 -0600
Joe, Apparently there is a gentleman's agreement according to this WIKI entry ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WARC_bands ) which says "Due to their relatively small bandwidth of 100 kHz or less, there
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00251.html (8,272 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: "Gary K9GS" <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:04:17 -0600
Take another look at the rules on the sponsor's web site. they state 160,80,40,20,15,10M ONLY. In fact, scroll down to the end of your post (and this one- sorry for not snipping) and it says the same
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00252.html (19,024 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:47:43 -0600
That is pretty confusing. It seems they are saying in the one that they are only inviting people to work each other on WARC bands by sked and not by calling CQ Contest on the WARC bands. That may or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00253.html (10,156 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: "David Kozinn, K2DBK" <dkozinn@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:07:09 -0500
The rules on http://zerolandqsoparty.com no longer mention WARC at all. 73, David, K2DBK k2dbk.com k2dbk.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00254.html (10,083 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@att.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 16:08:27 -0500
If you don't exchange county name within zeroland, forget the county hunters to participate. If you are going to have a contest on that very busy weeekend, you should adopt an exchange that will be s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00255.html (8,676 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: ZEROLAND QSO PARTY <radioham@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:36:35 -0600
Certainly some good points John. We know we are small potatoes, and wont give up and stop until we get it right! I hope you have read the website we have changed a lot of rules to fit the NEQP & 7QP
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00256.html (9,629 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:43:12 -0800
We restarted the dormant Minnesota QSO Party just a few years ago, and did a lot of work to make sure we activate every county. Participation is building every year. But it takes work! Certainly some
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00257.html (9,404 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:03:27 -0500
There should not, should not, should not be any contest activity on the WARC bands. 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00258.html (10,519 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zeroland QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Dick Frey - K4XU <k4xu@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:09:56 -0800
Not only the WARC band stuff... Did anyone notice that there are already the following activities on that weekend: 0000Z May 7 2400Z May 8 3.5-28 50-432 MARAC CW and SSB Contests 0001Z May 7 2359Z Ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00259.html (8,386 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zeroland QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: mike l dormann dormann <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:47:15 -0800
i use colored pencils to keep my log book neat and tidy when i work multiple contests mike w7dra ____________________________________________________________ Become Six Sigma Certified Villanova Six
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00260.html (9,132 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zeroland QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:38:28 -0800
Dick that is a very very good thing. It makes it sort-of a mini NAQP. Everyone can do their own contest while there is a lot of other activity which can only help and make for good scores. The more t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00261.html (9,699 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zeroland QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:52:02 -0700
The MARAC QSO Party is probably going to move to July. W0MU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00265.html (10,363 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: ZEROLAND QSO PARTY <radioham@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 08:28:51 -0600
The ZQP is a new breed of Ham radio contest gents. Serious, We in no way are trying to compete with NEQP or 7qp or any other. It's not a county hunters contest, and for that we have eight states in Z
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00273.html (10,558 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:37:34 -0600
On 11/14/2010 8:28 AM, ZEROLAND QSO PARTY wrote: IE The Missouri This to me brings up the question, "What Makes A Good Contest A Good Contest"? What makes one more popular than another? As an example
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00274.html (10,151 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZEROLAND QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: ZEROLAND QSO PARTY <radioham@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 10:30:31 -0600
EXACTLY....EXACTLY... Milt, N5IA You have got it it Sir ... You have it xactly like we were talking about... More=more and when 22 states are all involved and hunting and pouncing and working the wor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00275.html (14,354 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu