Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+contesting\s+amps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+contesting\s+amps\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] contesting amps (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:45:59 -0600; Hi all, Considering an amp to replace my homebrew 4-400s. I'd like something durable, not necessarily a California kilowatt and self-contained (no external HV PS). The more portable, the better. I ge; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00437.html (7,013 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting amps (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:19:32 -0800; I have an AL-1500. Works great. And an AL-1200. Works great. -- George Fremin III - K5TR geoiii@kkn.net http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing lis; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00438.html (7,367 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting amps (score: 1): Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:46:21 -0800; I have an Ameritron AL-1200. You can touch 1.5KW legal (USA) limit on every band, and it's run a lot of contests in perhaps 15 years of use. So far it's been trouble free. I think the 3CX1200A7 is a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00439.html (9,454 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting amps (score: 1): Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:52:43 -0600; Hi Kelly, Just like K5TR's experience, we have had 100% success using both the AL-1500 and AL-1200 amplifiers for contest service. No problems at all. I know the KC1XX team also uses several Ameritro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00442.html (8,466 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting amps (score: 1): Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:33:15 -0500; We've been using a Ameritron AL-1200. It is full legal limit, and is a very forgiving amp. It will loaf along all day without straining itself. Only downside is that it is a heavy devil. 70 pounds II; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00445.html (8,434 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting amps (score: 1): Author: Richard Detweiler <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:25:31 -0600; I use, AL1500s All of them 100%. Has more power than legally possible, it just yawns at the RTTY contests. Tube is so over rated it will last a life time, Only drawback is the manual tune, it is not; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00446.html (9,162 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting amps (score: 1): Author: "Tom Haavisto" <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:07:45 -0500; Hi Kelly I have a QRO HF2500. Purchased new on eBay, and it is a very nice amp. There are pictures on the QRO web site, and it includes a vacuum realy for QSK operation. I also have an Ameritron AL-1; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00447.html (9,863 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting amps (score: 1): Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:46:09 -0800; I also like the AL-1500, although the blower is a little loud when set on HIGH. The amp requires about 50W of drive for full output, so you have plenty of headroom with a 100W output rig, especially; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00452.html (10,893 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting amps (score: 1): Author: Pete Michaelis - N8TR <pete.n8tr@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:21:01 -0500; I would like to echo what others have said about the Ameritron AL-1200. I have had mine since early in 1985 (serial # 089). It has been used in many, many contests both at my QTH and elsewhere withou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00453.html (8,207 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]