Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ham\s+radio\s+is\s+dead\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ham\s+radio\s+is\s+dead\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ham radio is dead? (score: 1): Author: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:18:01 -0500; i must comment, as i sit here filling out qsl cards (the bane of being ZK1DRA and 3D2/W7DRA, W7DRA/VC7, etc), listening to 40m cw on my HRO60, and hearing the watery EU stations talking to LOUD POWER; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00212.html (8,899 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ham radio is dead? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Macklin" <macklinbob@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:30:03 -0800; This is what I am observing here in Seattle. The 80M band is quiet until a contest. $0M has a little activity. I often hear someone call CQ for a 1/2hr with no apperent response. And the I hear someo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00216.html (10,398 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ham radio is dead? (score: 1): Author: W0uo@cs.com; Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:19:41 -0500; Mike makes an interesting point. For a long time I've thought that there must be a purpose in order for us to take the time to communicate. Shooting the bull, exchanging reports, rigs, weather, etc c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00218.html (10,104 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ham radio is dead? (score: 1): Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:18:28 EST; thought that there must be a purpose in order for us to take the time to communicate. Shooting the bull, exchanging reports, rigs, weather, etc can get old after awhile. For most of us this amounts t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00219.html (8,951 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] ham radio is dead? (score: 1): Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>; Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:11:57 -0600; Hmmmm.... Could some of it be that back then there weren't so many people listening to others call CQ until they quit? Dale, kg5u _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00220.html (8,272 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] ham radio is dead? (score: 1): Author: W0uo@cs.com; Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:07:45 EST; Paul, Heaven forbid that you think I said an operator should not improve himself, but otherwise your response makes my point exactly, i.e., make the contact, break the pileup, beat someone else to th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00221.html (7,937 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] ham radio is dead? (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:41:05 EST; Ham radio has always had a little competition in it since the origins of the hobby......the first across the Atlantic, the first to have WAC, or WAS or DXCC or 5 band DXCC or BPL. That's part of the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00222.html (7,830 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] ham radio is dead? (score: 1): Author: "PY2NY - Vitor" <py2ny@terra.com.br>; Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 08:49:40 -0300; Can you imagine 40/80m at our side, with no more than 250 really active radio operators? Next step - sell our bands for commercial use?? Best 73 to all - py2ny De:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com Pa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00229.html (11,610 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]