Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+public\s+logs\s+\(there\s+are\s+no\s+secrets\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs (there are no secrets) (score: 1)
Author: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Logs should be public. There are no secrets. Everything I know (knew?) about radio contesting I either learned on the air or I asked someone else. Those guys who are perennial top operators answered
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00220.html (7,413 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs (there are no secrets) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:29:39 -0400
But those people CHOSE to answer your questions, they were not FORCED to do it. Mandating public Open Logs is forcing me to do so, without any choice whatsoever on my part. I don't have a problem bei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00224.html (9,009 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs (there are no secrets) (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:24:45 -0500
Here we go again!... Nothing is forced upon you. Just don't enter those contests. Go play golf or do something that doesn't irritate you. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN -- Original Message -- From: "Ron Nota
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00227.html (11,236 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs (there are no secrets) (score: 1)
Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:04:42 -0700
Mandating public Open Logs is forcing me to do so, without any choice Actually not. I gently suggest that if you don't want your log made public, then don't submit it. You are not forced to submit. Y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00228.html (8,111 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs (there are no secrets) (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
One of the nice things about public logs is that it provides a learning opportunity, particularly for new contesters. You can look and see who was being worked when you had a NIL with the particular
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00241.html (11,142 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs (there are no secrets) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:28:37 -0600
Hi Hank, I have been castigated in the past by one contest sponsor (in private, fortunately), for stating that because I did something that was not allowed by the rules, I chose not to submit my log.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00245.html (8,870 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] public logs (there are no secrets) (score: 1)
Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:53:56 -0400
Well I don't agree that there are no secrets left, I have one. Probably won't help the top ten stations too much, but it could. The year I used my "secret" strategy, no one else was doing the same th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00252.html (10,374 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] public logs (there are no secrets) (score: 1)
Author: "Mike N0HI" <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:45:54 -0400
I look at it like this: Once submitted, my logs become the property of the contest sponsor. They may do with them as they please. If they make the logs public, so be it. The moment I disagree with th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00257.html (12,279 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu