Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+radio\s+MP\s+vs\s+all\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] radio MP vs all (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Dougherty NQ4I" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 09:15:15 -0400
Here is my 2 cents worth....the nq4i m-m station has historically used the MP for the 11 stations...one year we were one MP short...so one member suggested he bring his new MKV...we first put it on 4
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00009.html (7,435 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] radio MP vs all (score: 1)
Author: Scott Manthe <n9aa@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 14:25:52 -0500
It was probably locking up due to it's external power supply. You be surprised at just how much of the MP innards the Field and Mark V share. The Field is essentially the same rig, with slightly diff
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00012.html (7,988 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] radio MP vs all (score: 1)
Author: "W4ZW" <w4zw@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 18:06:51 -0400
bang for the $$. I agree. I've had just about everything except for the new IC-7800 and Yaesu FTdx series, and I keep going back to my FT-1000D as my rig of choice. It hears really, really well! I a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00014.html (7,256 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] radio MP vs all (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 20:57:31 -0700
I agree, Scott. It would be interesting to test the MKV in a similar environment with some ferrites wrapped around the power supply cables. I'll have to run that test sometime. BTW, when we took the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00027.html (9,534 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] radio MP vs all (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 08:26:35 +0200
Except for the ORION and FT-9000 (maybe the IC7800 also) the FT-1000D is the ONLY radio that will measure in the 90 dB IMD3DR bracket, atleast after it has been "slightly" modified. Whats needed is a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00028.html (8,534 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] radio MP vs all (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Putnam" <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 19:02:11 -0600
And how does that measure up compared to the Drake R4C with all the Sherwood mods?? Even close spaced? Thanks, Dale - WC7S - in Wy _________________________________________________________________ It
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00052.html (8,222 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] radio MP vs all (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 06:55:26 +0200
Well I don&acute;t know since I don&acute;t have one with ALL the mods. Sherwood himself has measured a R-4C with CF-600/6 roofing filter at 84 dB dynamic range. I have a late SNR R-4C with 6EJ7/6BE6
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00054.html (8,147 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu