Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+re\:\s+Casual\s+contesters\.\.\.\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: k2kw@prodigy.net (KEN SILVERMAN)
Date: Sun Mar 18 18:09:32 2001
HI Pete, We have done a similar analysis on the 6Y4A, 6Y2A, 4M7X logs (which were all M/M events, generating around 16-18,000 QSOs each CQ WW CW). Basically what we found was on any given contest, b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00256.html (8,493 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: k1ir@designet.com (Jim Idelson)
Date: Mon Mar 19 08:19:40 2001
Kenny, Really interesting analysis. Now, take it off on a tangent. What is the average percentage of calls in each year's log that shows up in the published results? Certainly, you don't make it out
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00260.html (8,423 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Mon Mar 19 10:35:50 2001
<< We have done a similar analysis on the 6Y4A, 6Y2A, 4M7X logs (which were all M/M events, generating around 16-18,000 QSOs each CQ WW CW). Kenny, Interesting comments. I'm curious how many 6 bander
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00261.html (8,731 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: k2kw@prodigy.net (KEN SILVERMAN)
Date: Mon Mar 19 08:58:17 2001
John, In our logs, there is a fair amount of variability. For 6 banders to occur, conditions must be good on both 10m and 160m. When we first started looking at our logs in 1997 (6Y4A), 10m was not r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00262.html (8,046 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: ve3bbh@interlog.com (Paul, VE3ZT)
Date: Mon Mar 19 20:49:41 2001
Right on! Sometimes all-band entries are, though.... -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00264.html (7,097 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon Mar 19 21:05:37 2001
copy of the >results. If I'm a casual contester and I don't subscribe to CQ, never even see the But how many of us subscribe to CQ only for the contest rules and results? 73, Pete N4ZR Contesting is!
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00266.html (8,083 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon Mar 19 22:47:23 2001
The best way to identify a casual contester (really, really casual) is when he or she doesn't come up when you do a super check partial, using a recently updated data file. My impression is that 10-1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00267.html (7,790 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: k8gt@flash.net (Gerry Treas)
Date: Mon Mar 19 20:20:02 2001
Jim, Sorry, I don't buy it. I've been a ham for 42 years and only been semi serious (can I be anything more than semi with 100 W and a multi band vertical?) contesting for 10 or 11 years. I submitted
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00268.html (9,905 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Tue Mar 20 00:49:17 2001
Besides me? Cheers, Steve K7LXC -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00269.html (7,397 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner)
Date: Tue Mar 20 12:41:37 2001
results? I used to, until last month. Just let my CQ sub. drop after umpteen years. I was thinking of dropping it a few years ago, then found out about a magazine discounter in CA offering CQ for $8/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00271.html (8,203 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ)
Date: Wed Mar 21 00:10:45 2001
If enough of us do this, we can kiss the CQ contests good bye in the near future. In my opinion, this view is very short-sighted. Adding this cost to the total amount of money that most of us, who a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00278.html (8,305 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner)
Date: Wed Mar 21 01:42:12 2001
<snip> Bob, What does CQ provide for me? One issue per year which I read the contest results (CQWW CW). I don't care about the others. I do enjoy reading K1ASomething's column. That's about it for CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00279.html (9,291 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: bogus@does.not.exist.com (bogus@does.not.exist.com)
Date: Wed Mar 21 11:18:28 2001
Hi, I also subscribe to CQ Magazine for its contest listings. I understand that it might not be good for all contesters to stop their subscriptions because that might cause CQ Magazine to experience
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00288.html (8,682 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: n3bb@mindspring.com (Jim George)
Date: Sat Mar 24 06:53:14 2001
I really don't understand why people would be on this reflector, and then state that they are letting CQ magazine drop for $30 a year. For me, CQ and QST are like my annual support of NPR and the loc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00297.html (9,598 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu