Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+section\s+names\,\s+SD\s+v\s+SDG\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:06:41 -0500
I had a number of "sixes" send their section as SD. I automatically converted that to SDG until I realized that one of the sixes I was working probably was, I recalled, in South Dakota, so I logged i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00284.html (7,320 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG (score: 1)
Author: N6KI Dennis Vernacchia <n6ki_73@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:17:17 -0800
Any contestor, worth working, in San Diego, knows to send SDG Unless some real newbies showed up, I doubt anyone in San Diego would be so stupid as to send SD 73, Dennis N6KI Sandy Eggo _____________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00296.html (8,211 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG (score: 1)
Author: "Craig Cook" <craig.n7or@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:24:51 -0800
I've heard "ORE" for ORegon, too. Not sure why. I guess too many letters are better than not enough, like SD for SDG. After all, It's just 1 dit. -- -- 73, Craig Cook - N7OR in Sandy, OR == "...then
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00304.html (8,984 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 23:34:46 -0000
NOW NOW They already have sent ??6XXX for a call that should be the answer after all Quack _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00305.html (9,995 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 01:06:52 -0000
One of the advantages of KP4 is that the location gives you enough of a lead that you can bust a bunch of QSOs and still win! :) Randy, K5ZD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00308.html (9,108 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:27:54 -0500
I don't think I agree, though I wouldn't characterize it as "stupidity." Seriously, there are people who get on and make their first QSO ever and plenty who don't have any idea what section they're i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00309.html (11,846 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 03:49:20 +0000
KE3Q said: "Seriously, there are people who get on and make their first QSO ever and plenty who don't have any idea what section they're in. " I worked an N2 who gave me a perfect exchange, except fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00322.html (8,129 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:15:50 -0500
I wouldn't assume that. We saw a couple of stations in San Diego sending SD instead of SDG in the Pa QSO Party last month, so when in doubt, we asked and confirmed if it was one or the other. Some fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00324.html (10,455 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 09 Nov 2006 08:40:40 -0600
I have in such cases asked what their QTH is and, working from either memory or a map, determined which section they were in. Of course, that's pretty easy if they say "Buffalo" or "Riverhead", (whic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00343.html (9,212 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG (score: 1)
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 15:35:10 -0000
You'd think so but, alas, I worked many N2 stations in WA and W6 Stations in MDC. W1VE was in KY. I don't know how many different prefixes numbers I got from Florida. Because there is no absolute rel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00351.html (12,054 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:44:43 +0000
I have to admit that I have absolutely no idea what ARRL section Riverhead NY would be in so I don't know if that would be very useful. With all due appologies to the good folks in Riverhead, I'm no
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00379.html (10,318 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu