Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+sending\s+DX\s+QSLs\s+from\s+US\s+other\s+than\s+via\s+ARRL\s+service\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service (score: 1)
Author: "FritzOAQ" <fritz@k4oaq.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:11:46 -0400
Is there any way to send numerous DX QSLs to numerous other countries other than via ARRLs outgoing DX QSL service? I'm not an ARRL member is the reason I'm asking. 73, Fritz K4OAQ __________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00077.html (6,751 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service (score: 1)
Author: Mike Reublin NF4L <nf4l@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 06:02:02 -0400
GlobalQSL is one way. 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00079.html (8,138 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 23:22:27 -0700
Why aren't you a member? Lots of good reasons to be a member, can't think of any reasons not to. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00081.html (7,883 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:19:08 +0700
Fritz....... You can use USPS with special rates for overseas or any other carrier to mail your cards directly to the National QSL Buro for each country that has one. Those addresses should be availa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00083.html (9,188 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service (score: 1)
Author: Alfred Laun <hs0zar@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:32:43 -0400
Gents: Here is the URL of one such service. I have not used it myself, but as a "3" call station K3FN does use our incoming QSL service. (Users of ARRL incoming bureaus are not required to be ARRL me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00084.html (10,274 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service (score: 1)
Author: "FritzOAQ" <fritz@k4oaq.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:02:50 -0400
Well Jim, Way back when QST printed contest results, I wud ck them out dreaming one day I wud show up as the winner. As consolation, I cud find my call near the bottom of the pack. Then, hard times h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00085.html (9,437 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:35:24 -0700
I feel the same way, Fritz. I have been in the ARRL for along time but some of the things they are pushing now I just don't agree with. Also to me, the magazine is just not interesting any more. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00086.html (11,422 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:11:32 -0500 (CDT)
Hi Fritz, A few brief comments if I may... I too lament the loss of the printed contest results from QST. While I understand the reasons why at the time, I thought then and think now that it was a mi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00088.html (12,843 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service (score: 1)
Author: Emily Thiel <p43e@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 18:07:12 +0000
The IARU keep a list of all QSL bureaus and their status: http://www.iaru.org/qsl-bureaus.html 73, Emily Thiel, P43E, P.O.Box 614, ARUBA. p43e@hotmail.com http://www.qsl.net/p43e ____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00091.html (11,582 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service (score: 1)
Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:48:22 -0500
"PS Can we revisit contest results in printed QST?" No, you can't. The world has moved on. I'm happy to read in QST about new technology that I barely understand; that's what learning is all about. T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00093.html (9,157 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Chamalian" <w1rm@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 07:55:45 -0400
If you are happy to use the QSL bureau system then Global QSL is definitely worth looking into. I've used them for years and am very pleased with the service. They will print your QSL (you can design
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00095.html (10,685 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service (score: 1)
Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:20:26 -0500
I stand corrected! From "Introducing Logbook of the World": As stated in LoTW's Mission and Objectives, membership in the ARRL is not a requirement. My excuse is that I've been an ARRL life member si
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00096.html (8,765 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:25:58 -0700
I would be, if QST had anything worth reading. It almost never does, and I often find significant errors in what I read. QST is no longer a good reason for being an ARRL member. 73, Jim K9YC ________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00097.html (9,513 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu