Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+why\s+Unlimited\s+\[aka\s+Assisted\]\?\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optonline.net
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:10:23 +0000 (GMT)
Hi all (especially users of assistance: packet/internet/spotting nets/etc). So - I am looking at the SS results summary (thanks Dink) on 3830. I note that (currently) the number 1 slot for SO HP Unli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00249.html (7,495 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: "Chad Kurszewski" <chad.we9v@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 00:20:17 -0600
Maybe you're thinking about it backwards. Maybe the Unlimited ops choose to be unlimited because it places them close to first place instead of after tenth place. For example, my (currently) 7th plac
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00263.html (9,633 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:06:45 +0000 (GMT)
Why do people use crutches? Same reason for whatever assisted. (Hint: Those who can run on their own can outrun those on crutches :-) Yuri, K3BU _______________________________________________ CQ-Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00269.html (7,342 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: "Gerard Lynch" <gerrylynch@freenetname.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:38:08 -0000
In 2005 I went low power assisted in WPX CW - came 3rd in Europe and 4th in the World with just a 42 metre long doublet (admittedly having my local club's contest call of M2W - a unique prefix - help
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00298.html (8,610 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Reagan" <mreagan@preciscom.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:31:32 -0700
At my station we do a multi effort for the fun of operating as a group...we all learn from every contest...everyone in our small group has a particular reason I guess one op has no room at his QTH...
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00317.html (9,431 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 15:42:16 -0000
Why do people use amplifiers? Why do people use stacked beams? Why do people use 2 radios? The advantage! In my opinion, the cluster is not a crutch but a tool, like any other tool, used to give an a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00352.html (8,967 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 22:37:11 -0600
HI Paul, I think the crux of Doug's question centres around the fact that packet is NOT an advantage, given K1TTT's analysis of SO and SO-distracted scores and how badly the SO-distracted guys get be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00385.html (10,672 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:00:46 +0200
Nah. The real reason for going unlimited is just to have more Fun. It is Fun to use one omnidirectional antenna and one QRP radio. It is More Fun to use a set of monoband small wire antennas and a LP
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00387.html (9,364 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: 4X4KF <4x4kf@iarc.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:32:15 +0200
Paul, Amplifiers , antennas and 2 Radios are still in the territory of amateur Radio, is cluster too? Does the end justify the means? If using a cluster is valid so is calling on the echolink or phon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00389.html (10,103 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:25:45 -0800
In SS the spots should never detract you - with so few mults it is not very hard to work them all. N5KO gave a talk to the NCCC some years after moving out to the west coast. They wanted to know how
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00395.html (9,473 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 17:14:07 +0000
his response was that from an Arizona city lot, he's never going to beat the big boys in B, not just WP3R but also K5TR and W5WMU and the like. Well guys, if he ever decides to sell that "city lot",
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00399.html (8,232 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:12:54 +0200
... ... I am confused. I am sure people go unlimited because they want to have Fun. I am sure people go QRP with wires below 15 meters (50ft) because they want to have Fun. I am sure people go to all
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00403.html (9,011 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:13:48 -0000
That's another way of looking at it HI. 73 -- Paul VO1HE _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00404.html (11,399 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: "David Hachadorian" <k6ll@adelphia.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:37:40 -0000
-- On 160, you must be thinking of N6LL, not K6LL. I can barely work Texas on 160. N6LL is a 160 specialist. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ . _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00406.html (9,339 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve.Root@culligan.com" <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:45:41 -0000
Don't sell your self short Dave. Many's the time I winced and said "Ouch" when I tuned across your signal. You're LOUD up here. 73 Steve K0SR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00409.html (11,101 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike K9MI" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:22:49 -0000
As a small station in the "black hole", I get beat up pretty bad on Friday night of a Dx contest. I've not been very active the past year or two, due to health problems. But, I'll cut to the chase. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00412.html (9,778 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 18:38:45 -0500
Amen!!!! Jukka, your post is printed and mounted on my wall now. I recommend all do the same! 8^) - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00448.html (8,924 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu