Anybody know if you can bridge and route on the same radio (KN200 in this rather bizarre case :-))? If so, please can you share the config? Turning on routing seems to automatically deny bridging of
You can't do both. Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions Anybody know if you can bridge and route on the same radio (KN200 in this rather bizarre case :-))? If so, please can you share the
** set ISP-Base to bridge, and do the routing on satellites. this way you'll be able to have bridging clients and routing clients. it would be bonus if you can afford to have real router on base sid
It's a shame that with 4 interfaces on the KN-200 that you can't define L2 bridge groups - For example, define Interfaces 1 & 2 as "Group 1" and Interfaces 3 & 4 as "Group 2" so that you can then rou
Bridging and routing works.. except that if you have both enabled, then all TCP/IP is routed and all other protocols are bridged, AppleTalk.. etc. Sadly for TCP/IP it seems that it is per unit and no
You can do that with a MikroTik RouterOS AP. http://www.mikrotik.com/docs2.8/interface/bridge.main John www.mikrotik.com At 06:15 PM 4/27/2004, you wrote: It's a shame that with 4 interfaces on the K
John, Have you thought about supporting the KN PC Driver for Linux so you can setup a Satellite station off a KN TC network? You can do that with a MikroTik RouterOS AP. http://www.mikrotik.com/docs2
I think supporting KN board is not a basic problem to connecting linux box to TC-base. The basic problem is that the TC-Client is not open-source. TC-Base and TC-Client is KarlNet core bussiness. Fur
At 02:35 PM 4/28/2004, you wrote: John, Have you thought about supporting the KN PC Driver for Linux so you can setup a Satellite station off a KN TC network? For 2.4GHz solutions, most people use ou
John, You will have a polling system soon? Please provide more details? Thanks, Dan [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] can cost and MikroTik only this? what I are ours some/all not define and Gro
Yes, I already use Mikrotik and that is plan b in this case... The site is solar powered and I therefore have limited power. It would have been easy to just use the Kalrnet gear that is already there
At 05:13 PM 4/28/2004, you wrote: John, You will have a polling system soon? Please provide more details? Here is the initial document from a test package that you can put on a MikroTik AP/router/cli
John, I've been a user of MT for some time, and have been very pleased with the router (which is our gateway router) and the continual improvements to same. I'm really looking forward to this Nstreme
At 06:57 PM 4/29/2004, you wrote: John, I've been a user of MT for some time, and have been very pleased with the router (which is our gateway router) and the continual improvements to same. I'm real
John, This may be a stupid question, but with this new polling protocol, will the client need to also have this software or will a standard .11x system talk to your ap running Nstreme? the same. have
Opps, sorry I read below your answer already. Ignore. the same. have KN link. this new Yes, this is why we started making this protocol -- to get the highest speed out of a long distance links and ov
I noticed it will support both clients (non polling & polling) at the same time, impressive [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] will to I application? occurs have fram What these, on also so for c
At 04:57 PM 4/30/2004, you wrote: John, This may be a stupid question, but with this new polling protocol, will the client need to also have this software or will a standard .11x system talk to your
I'd really like to hear about CPE solutions with Nstreme PtMP. Currently, I'm using i19 panels with TC KN-50's, which I really like for their robust PoE, reliability, minimal assembly, and very decen
John I have been reading about this protocol and wanted a clarification, does it have true polling or are you just changing the ACK timing?? Sincerely, Tony Morella Demarc Technology Group, A Wireles