Hello to all, I have been having a strange problem for quite a while. I have spoken to Karlnet about this and they told me it was a rare occurrence and _maybe_ one other customer was seeing this but
Chris, Who have you been dealing with in our office? Kevin ____________________________________ Kevin R. Knuth Business Development Manager North America Corporate Office: 614-822-5275 x130 Home Offi
I now see this after upgrading one of our wavepoint II (bnc connector) to v4.31, on its "backhaul" link Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems http://www.wbsysnet.com/ 877-685-0578 dan.metcalf@wbsysn
Turbocell station entries Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems http://www.wbsysnet.com/ 877-685-0578 dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com On connector) [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com] communication and sp
Kevin Knuth wrote: Chris, Who have you been dealing with in our office? Hello, I began talking about this to a pleasant yet overworked Doug Harman in June 2001. I have given up talking to Karlnet sin
Dan Metcalf wrote: I now see this after upgrading one of our wavepoint II (bnc connector) to v4.31, on its "backhaul" link Hello, We have been having this problem since 3.75 and probably before. Howe
3 years ago we decided to try turning it down from 11 to 5, little better... I can tell you that myself and MANY other folks out there benefit from 1-2mbit rates standard, wastes less radio time and
Fade margin is key, but when you add polling, the radio's don't give any real throughput unless your at 5.5 Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems http://www.wbsysnet.com/ 877-685-0578 dan.metcalf@wb
All, I waited for a response from our engineers before I made comment about this issue. Here is what I found out: Most likely there is a noise issue with a particular satellite and thus the transmit/
This is regarding interface speeds. Assuming a low number of users in a sector; will the actual receive speed drop if the base radio was set from 5.5 to 2mbits? I do remember losing about 20kbps at o
Kevin Is there any reason not to have the system default to this setup? Maybe have an option to modify the retry attempts before moving on? Sincerely Tony Morella Demarc Technology Group Office: 908-
Kevin, What can we look at to determine if this is the case? Does "In Discards" or "FCS Errors" help? I have a setup in which I can simulate the problem if you would like to look at it. Thanks, Dan M
no...w/ TurboCell, there is no adaptive modulation (remember, you hard code data rate in interface setup under advanced) -Charles This is regarding interface speeds. Assuming a low number of users in
Hi Charles, I am not sure if you understood my question. If a customer was receiving 239Kbps from a 256kbps assignment under a radio rate of 5.5mbps, would the customer see less than 239kbps if I set
yes...you will be modulating at a less efficient rate, and will have less overall bandwidth to play with -Charles Hi Charles, I am not sure if you understood my question. If a customer was receiving
Hello, I believe it would be a good idea. This situation is quite difficult to reproduce and only causes the mentioned problem for a short while. Once it "times-out" or whatever, all satellites resu
The TurboCell algorithm is pretty complex, so I am not sure of the "delay or timeout" before it moves on. However, you must realize the forcing TurboCell to "not wait" has an effect too! I just wonde
Thus the reason for a dynamic variable that can be changed by the WISP and OEMS. This way we can do true field test and see what really works. Even if its beta code there is enough takers to try ;) S