Kevin
> We could, theoretically, change TurboCell so that it does not
> wait for a satellite with problems such as noise, but moves
> on to others if it can't transmit in say 5 or 10 trials.
Is there any reason not to have the system default to this setup? Maybe
have an option to modify the retry attempts before moving on?
Sincerely
Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group
Office: 908-996-7995
Cell: 908-246-9170
Fax: 908-847-0202
email: tony@demarctech.com
http://www.demarctech.com
Open Chat Server http://www.demarctech.com:8000
Yahoo IM: tonymorella
Wireless Solution Provider
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Knuth
> Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 8:42 AM
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem
>
>
> All,
>
> I waited for a response from our engineers before I made
> comment about this issue. Here is what I found out:
>
> Most likely there is a noise issue with a particular
> satellite and thus the transmit/receive has problems and
> TurboCell keeps polling the same satellite until it can send
> its packet out. This could be due to an outside noise source.
> When you lower the speed then the radio's sensitivity
> increases and it can receive better.
>
> We are often asked why the numbers in the Wireless Link test
> and TurboCell station entries are different. This is because
> the Warless Link test is an 802.11 test and the radios can do
> auto-fallback which causes the link to report a stronger
> signal than TurboCell can as we disable auto-fallback. So
> even though the Wireless link test could show a very strong
> signal, it may only be set at 1!
>
> TurboCell tries to keep all satellites online and not lose packets.
>
> We could, theoretically, change TurboCell so that it does not
> wait for a satellite with problems such as noise, but moves
> on to others if it can't transmit in say 5 or 10 trials.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> Behalf Of Dan Metcalf
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 11:29 PM
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem
>
>
> Fade margin is key, but when you add polling, the radio's
> don't give any real throughput unless your at 5.5
>
> Dan Metcalf
> Wireless Broadband Systems
> http://www.wbsysnet.com/
> 877-685-0578
> dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]
> On
> > Behalf Of Scott
> Stevens
> > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 11:02 PM
> > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem
> >
> > 3 years ago we decided to try turning it down from 11 to 5, little
> > better...
> >
> > I can tell you that myself and MANY other folks out there
> benefit from
> > 1-2mbit rates standard, wastes less radio time and let's be
> honest...
> In
> > an
> > outdoor environment it's not higher speed, it's FADE MARGIN!!!
> >
> > --
> > Scott Stevens
> > DefactoWireless.com
> > AIM: wirelesscott
> > Mobile: 970-274-3070
> >
> > "Every product imaginable at fair prices!"
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > ---
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/ka> rlnet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/ka> rlnet
>
|