Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+new\s+karlnet\s+units\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+new\s+karlnet\s+units\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:13:22 -0400; I recently had a chance to look at the new kn-50 embedded antennas setup, and I was very impressed with the entire system, from hardware, to software, and onboard speaker with "audio" alignment; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00054.html (8,374 bytes)
2. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Nate McLain" <nate@wireless-guy.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:17:52 -0500; Does the radio function any better then the WPBase boards?? We haven't had anything but problems with those boards... Are they using the same radio board or are they a ubicom based radio? Nate I rece; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00055.html (9,169 bytes)
3. Re: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:31:34 -0700; They are Ubicom-based. I've been using lots of them imbedded in AntennasAmerica 19dB panels and have been happy with both performance and ease of installation. Norm; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00056.html (10,386 bytes)
4. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:32:50 -0400; What types of issues are you having w/ the WPBase boards (you using orinocco radio's?) The kn50 is a ubicom system [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00057.html (10,658 bytes)
5. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:42:15 -0400; Its almost as easy as a canopy install :-) Have you used any of the kn100 or kn200 boards in the antennas? [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] and radio? hardware,; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00058.html (11,645 bytes)
6. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Nate McLain" <nate@wireless-guy.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:07:59 -0500; mainly heat issues with the WPBase boards.. Or just general lockup problems with them no matter what version of KN we have on it. The reliability just isn't there with the boards. I have used the UBI; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00059.html (11,655 bytes)
7. Re: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:11:56 -0500; waverider over Alvarion? why are you going to 900 ....it is sooo expensive. Do you think you are getting the additional penetration necessary to make it worthwhile? them; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00060.html (13,069 bytes)
8. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:18:21 -0400; Yes I have seen heat issues w/ the WPBase boards as well, voltage is important and proper heat sinks [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] we radio? hardware,; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00061.html (13,319 bytes)
9. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Nate McLain" <nate@wireless-guy.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:19:54 -0500; You would think that if it was that important that KN would sell you what you needed in a package so you don't have to shop and do your own R&D on the boards... I would rather use RGs again.. :-) Suc; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00062.html (14,113 bytes)
10. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:46:52 -0400; No doubt, I agree with that - the kn50 boards lack the features of the RG, and the kn100 and kn200 boards require a lot of work to get it working... [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] what on KN; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00063.html (15,781 bytes)
11. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "smyers" <wifiengineer@telsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:49:44 -0400; Try YDI RG-ANT.. it's a combination rg and 18 db antenna.. great cpe! Kenneth "Scott" Myers Wireless Engineer smyers@telsouth.net (843) 842-7795 x 105 No doubt, I agree with that - the kn50 boards la; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00064.html (16,399 bytes)
12. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:16:48 -0500; All, I thought the word was already out- the heat issue is resolved. Voltage is still important, as it applies to PoE applications. I have documents that tell you the actual voltage you will need for; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00065.html (14,333 bytes)
13. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:16:48 -0500; Karlnet is selling complete units. Doesn't that save you R&D? They also have a one year limited warranty. Kevin ** Kevin R. Knuth Business Development Manager North America 260-424-9690 Regional Offi; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00066.html (16,601 bytes)
14. Re: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:22:35 -0500; I suppose they come with a "selectable output voltage" PS? maybe a label like this is on them?:; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00067.html (18,510 bytes)
15. Re: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:23:31 -0500; It's all the communication that Karlnet does....it just got lost...I'm sure. ;); /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00068.html (15,978 bytes)
16. Re: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:49:19 -0700; IMHO, the PoE voltage issue needs to be fixed forthwith. Not very good having to select different PS for different runs of CAT5e. Not to mention my use, can't use 24vdc on the thing...most frustratin; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00069.html (17,675 bytes)
17. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:51:43 -0400; What is the POE voltage issue? You have to use a specific voltage at the board? [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] good mention lost...I'm for is of get But using they antennas; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00070.html (19,441 bytes)
18. Re[2]: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Jon Loosle" <web@s1i.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:38:16 -0600; How was the head issue resolved? ** REPLY SEPARATOR **; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00071.html (17,058 bytes)
19. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 00:39:11 -0500; Correct! The voltage at the board is the issue! Kevin ** Kevin R. Knuth Business Development Manager North America 260-424-9690 Regional Office 614-822-5275 Corporate Office kknuth@karlnet.com www.ka; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00074.html (20,133 bytes)
20. Re: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1): Author: John Tully <tully@mikrotik.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:10:20 +0300; There is a standard called 802.3af and if the board design follows that standard, there are no problems. Of course the RouterBOARD 200 follows those and we have cable runs up to 150m even with POE (I; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00075.html (17,551 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]