Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[NA\-User\]\s+cQP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[NA\-User\]\s+cQP\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [NA-User] cQP (score: 1): Author: nn9k@arrl.net (Peter E. Beedlow); Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:38:47 -0500; Question-How is it possible with the NA 10-53 CQP Template, Non-California, to correctly score the following situation? "California stations operating on a county line must be counted only as one QSO; /archives//html/NA-User/2001-10/msg00006.html (6,578 bytes)
2. [NA-User] cQP (score: 1): Author: W0EBA@aol.com (W0EBA@aol.com); Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 19:06:12 EDT; << na-user@contesting.com >> I had the same problem. In my print file I was able to get it as a "dupe" listing because my two contacts were not new counties on one of the counties each had. But the .; /archives//html/NA-User/2001-10/msg00007.html (6,867 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]