Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Orion\]\s+Re\:\s+\[TenTec\]\s+Topband\:\s+BDR\s+redux\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Orion\]\s+Re\:\s+\[TenTec\]\s+Topband\:\s+BDR\s+redux\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:24:22 -0600; I think you totally misunderstand AGC THRESHOLD as applied in the Orion. The RF gain control in the less modern receivers you refer to does much more than simply change, as a byproduct, AGC threshol; /archives//html/Orion/2004-02/msg00006.html (7,715 bytes)
2. Re: [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 18:41:06 -0500; This is true. It's certainly better to have a separate AGC threshold, as in Orion. Unfortunately, AGC Threshold control on Orion is an ergonomic disaster. It should have had a knob assigned to itself; /archives//html/Orion/2004-02/msg00008.html (7,526 bytes)
3. Re: [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:52:59 -0600; The crash of the Hindenburg was a disaster. The threshold control can be set up to be one button push away ... Not sure I understand why adjusting THRESHOLD should have any impact on S-Meter indicat; /archives//html/Orion/2004-02/msg00009.html (7,676 bytes)
4. Re: [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:26:57 -0500; That's exactly too much for me :-) I'm not sure either, just a though that it's position should be indicated in relation to signal levels presented on the S meter. Those 5-digit microvolts (with ~1 d; /archives//html/Orion/2004-02/msg00010.html (7,475 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]