Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Another\s+Solar\s+Panel\s+RFI\s+System\s*$/: 71 ]

Total 71 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: Jim McCook <w6ya@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 01:54:34 +0000
All the RFI problems I've seen from neighbors have been solved by isolating the problem device from the line with an adequate EMI filter from Corcom.  One LED strip lighting problem was solved only b
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00024.html (6,726 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 07:53:14 +0000
As near as ARRL's work can tell, the interference from Solar Edge equipment is not being significantly radiated from house AC mains. W1VLF has used a probe to sniff the wiring of a Solar Edge system
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00025.html (9,126 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: Jim McCook <w6ya@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 17:01:35 +0000
It's interesting to hear that Solar Edge *is* actually radiating from the house wiring, if only in part.  It's still radiating from house wiring, so who knows where the main source of that interferen
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00026.html (11,625 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 18:38:17 +0000
QUOTE (from Jim, W6YA): " When trying to get help for the pool pump noise I was told by FCC that "I can still use my radio." Ask me why I'm bitter toward FCC. Complaints have become futile." I'm with
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00027.html (14,719 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 19:43:38 +0000
Well, yes, every device with active electronics does put some noise onto the AC mains and that noise will always be radiated. But there is no certainty that the noise will be radiated at a level stro
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00028.html (12,122 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: Gary Johnson via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 12:17:06 -0800
I can verify with 100% certainty that my neighbors SE system does NOT generate conducted emissions through the primary AC wiring at any significant level. I actually used a current probe and a spect
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00029.html (8,436 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: John Simander <drumbeat70@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 22:17:34 +0000
Is this "solar RFI: horse not a dead animal yet? They need to set up their own blog !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! John ________________________________ From: RFI <rfi-bounces+drumbeat70=outlook.com@contesting.com
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00034.html (9,482 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 04:56:22 -0600
Wait 'til you get one put in next to you Rob K5UJ _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00035.html (7,778 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 17:09:03 +0000
This is the only outlet I'm aware of where we can keep up with the efforts of ARRL (doing the job FCC should be doing) and the stance of the FCC. Remember, ARRL has both ears and eyes of the FCC with
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00036.html (8,625 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 12:28:43 -0600
Facts. Clay E. Autery, Jr. KY5G Rob K5UJ _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00037.html (8,718 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 10:32:19 -0800
On 12/18/2022 9:09 AM, David Eckhardt wrote: This is the only outlet I'm aware of where we can keep up with the efforts of ARRL (doing the job FCC should be doing) and the stance of the FCC. Remember
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00038.html (9,720 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 10:40:21 -0800
Yep. I'm on 8.5 acres in the Santa Cruz Mountains, with three solar systems at 60 degrees, 120 degrees, and 300 degrees azimuth. They have rendered my full wave 160M Beverages next to useless. The 60
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00039.html (8,729 bytes)

13. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: <wx5l@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 13:56:17 -0600
There have been comments that the ARRL has the FCC's ear. Really do they? Recently Jessica Rosenworcel , FCC chairwomen has made a statement about issues with Solar Edge RFI and said that S-6 to S-9
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00040.html (9,862 bytes)

14. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: Michael Carter <Mike.Carter@unh.edu>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 20:09:03 +0000
No flames, Randy - just a request for the source of the statement attributed to Ms. Rosenworcel, the FCC chairperson. I can't believe any FCC senior appointee would make a qualitative or quantitative
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00041.html (12,054 bytes)

15. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dyer W1SRD via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 12:09:08 -0800
Randy, What is the source of this statement? I find it unlikely the FCC Chair is commenting so specifically on this issue. If she is so familiar with this issue as to comment at this level of detail,
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00042.html (10,189 bytes)

16. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: "Dave (NK7Z)" <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 12:11:41 -0800
That sort of talk from the FCC scares me... Can you provide a reference to where she said that? 73, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00043.html (10,385 bytes)

17. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 13:06:09 -0800
Right. An S-meter displays the voltage at the input of a receiver. Its reading, even if properly calibrated, tells us nothing about the RF field strength (in mV/m) at a specified distance from a nois
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00045.html (11,532 bytes)

18. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 21:44:59 +0000
No flame throwing in the following: I've asked this before, but I'll pose the question again: What constitutes "harmful interference" and how does one put a quantitative and consistently measurable m
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00046.html (12,624 bytes)

19. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 12:43:19 +0000
I have never seen any such statement from the FCC. Can you cite the source of the claim that Rosenworcel proclaimed S9 not to be harmful interference? I would like to see that in context. The rules
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00055.html (10,481 bytes)

20. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 12:52:30 +0000
<What constitutes "harmful interference" and how does one put a quantitative and consistently measurable method and tool in place to make that measurement?> We do NOT want a quantitative definition o
/archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00056.html (10,910 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu