Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Canal\s+water\!\s+$\&\s+BPL$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Canal\s+water\!\s+$\&\s+BPL$\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Canal water! (& BPL) (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:20:03 -0000; You guys who seem hell bent on ARRL bashing need to get a grip. It's much better coordinated than you're giving it credit for. We are 650K licensed amateurs, of whom 170k support the national associa; /archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00110.html (8,920 bytes)
2. RE: [RFI] Canal water! (& BPL) (score: 1): Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:52:32 -0400; I have been a member of the ARRL since the day I received my novice ticket in 1990. There is nothing in my postings that can be construed as ARRL bashing, unless you're among those who consider const; /archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00116.html (9,774 bytes)
3. RE: [RFI] Canal water! (& BPL) (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:11:04 -0400; That about sums it up for me, too. Much of what "I" do is building on the work done by others, and I am more than pleased to serve as a conduit for that work. I had an interesting and productive exch; /archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00121.html (12,670 bytes)
4. RE: [RFI] Canal water! (& BPL) (score: 1): Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:40:57 -0400; I did not say 'no one within ARRL should be allowed to say that something is someone else's job', I suggested the creation of an organization responsible for winning the BPL war and then said 'No one; /archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00128.html (12,510 bytes)
5. RE: [RFI] Canal water! (& BPL) (score: 1): Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:05:04 -0400; I would modify that I am having a lot of trouble envisioning our media public relations staff responding to technical questions. Jen very much has the same problem with my speaking for her work with; /archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00130.html (15,663 bytes)
6. RE: [RFI] Canal water! (& BPL) (score: 1): Author: "Dave Bernstein" <dave.bernstein@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:08:49 -0400; The direct response is "assemble a team that is capable of executing the mission". This approach removes organizational barriers and their attendant complexity; it does not add another layer of compl; /archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00136.html (16,393 bytes)
7. RE: [RFI] Canal water! (& BPL) (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:54:24 -0500; I strongly agree. Constructive criticism, including, but not limited to, opposing points of view as to how things ought to be handled is NOT bashing, no matter how strongly stated. I am also an ARRL; /archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00141.html (10,842 bytes)
8. RE: [RFI] Canal water! (& BPL) (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:02:20 -0500; I thought the one in the most recent QST (July?) titled "Harmful Interference" was damn good. Jim _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.cont; /archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00144.html (7,913 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]