Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Clamp\s+on\s+RF\s+meter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Clamp\s+on\s+RF\s+meter\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Clamp on RF meter (score: 1): Author: "Martin Sole" <hs0zed@csloxinfo.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:16:36 +0700; I just built a clamp on RF current meter. Worky worky but I'm thinking about relative levels and how sensitive to make it. I have to think that in a high power ham station it might be reasonable to e; /archives//html/RFI/2011-02/msg00011.html (6,879 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Clamp on RF meter (score: 1): Author: Michael Germino <ad6aa@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:26:48 -0800 (PST); I built one and never worried about the scale. I had a knob to change the sensitivity. At a certain sensitivity, I would expect all the wires/ cables to have some RF. I only used it if I have a probl; /archives//html/RFI/2011-02/msg00017.html (9,110 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Clamp on RF meter (score: 1): Author: Bert Almemo <balmemo@sympatico.ca>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:37:09 -0500; Hi Martin, This link might help you. http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek/clamp-on/clamp-on.htm I built one of these and it works great. Good luck! 73 Bert, VE3NR (VE3OBU) I just built a clamp on RF curren; /archives//html/RFI/2011-02/msg00018.html (8,349 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] Clamp on RF meter (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:45:34 -0800; Not necessarily. Every wire (or conductor) is an antenna, whether we like it or not. A good ferrite choke acts like an open circuit, whereas a poor one (not enough turns) acts like an inductor, and o; /archives//html/RFI/2011-02/msg00019.html (8,318 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] Clamp on RF meter (score: 1): Author: "doc@kd4e.com" <doc@kd4e.com>; Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:00:11 -0500; Would this device tell me anything a MFJ-259b or MFJ-269 or other antenna analyzer would not? WOuld the antenna analyzer give better overall context to the data? -- Thanks! & 73, KD4E David Colburn h; /archives//html/RFI/2011-02/msg00021.html (9,322 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] Clamp on RF meter (score: 1): Author: Michael Germino <ad6aa@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:20:45 -0800 (PST); Well I thinking a little more simple than that. I was measuring RF current into a telephone handset. (Remember those, before cordless. Kids that was "Back in the day".) I plugged the filter into the; /archives//html/RFI/2011-02/msg00022.html (9,730 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] Clamp on RF meter (score: 1): Author: "Martin Sole" <hs0zed@csloxinfo.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:22:14 +0700; Thanks guys, I modelled mine on the one shown on the page Bert mentioned http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek/clamp-on/clamp-on.htm I'm not so much interested in absolute readings so a pot might be the way; /archives//html/RFI/2011-02/msg00023.html (8,989 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]