Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+DigiKeyer\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+DigiKeyer\s+II\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:15:43 -0600; IC746Pro, microHAM Digi Keyer II. One USB cable from the radio to the interface. One squid from the interface to the radio with 1/4" plug for CW, a 1/8" plug for CI-V and a howevermanypin DIN for ACC; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00085.html (8,814 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:29:28 -0600; With ACC1 disconnected, I was able to work ZM90DX in the 10 m test (not playing, just needed the New One). So I'm confident in the rest of my setup ... -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Trave; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00086.html (6,832 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Dale <svetanoff@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 17:02:30 -0600 (GMT-06:00); Peter, Interesting issue. 1. First, I assume that you are NOT using an amp after the IC746 Pro. Is that correct? 2. If you have not tried this yet, REDUCE output power to a level at which the RFI sto; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00087.html (11,190 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 18:03:00 -0600; 100 W. At least at the antenna port ... never an amp. Interesting idea. I will do this and report. Not a clue. They are probably 8-9 years old and, IINM, wasn't 43 more common than 31 back then? One; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00088.html (12,784 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 18:50:01 -0800; Hi Peter, See comments interspersed. First, download and study k9yc.com/RFI-Ham.pdf I suspect a Pin One Problem (see the tutorial) on the 746. One USB cable from the radio to the interface. One squid; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00091.html (11,753 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 22:18:00 -0600; As noted previously radio, PS, interface, PC are all tied to a ground rod outside the window of the radio room. I thought the interface was powered via the 5 V dc available via the USB cable but it's; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00095.html (10,362 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Kostas SV1DPI <sv1dpi@otenet.gr>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 07:30:39 +0200; Hello Peter Try use a different usb cable with digikeyer. Usually the usb cable is the problem with Microham products. Try also a different route for the cable or even better a different usb port. I; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00096.html (8,178 bytes)
8. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:24:43 -0500; I own two DigiKeyer II's and a DigiKeyer and they work well on CW and RTTY. This product is designed for digital modes, I have no idea how you are using on SSB. You should have purchased a MicroKeyer; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00097.html (9,769 bytes)
9. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:45:31 -0600; As I read it, he's using it as designed, CW and RTTY, but when he went on SSB for the SS contest he had bad set of RFI. Apparently he's narrowed the culprit down to the DigiKeyer or it's cabling. Is; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00098.html (11,008 bytes)
10. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:18:09 -0500; Actually I have used a DigiKeyer on SSB from P40A, but only to interface the radio's frequency data to my laptop. The device works fine as a COM to USB converter for band data. The mic was connected; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00099.html (11,105 bytes)
11. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:34:56 -0800; Go back and CAREFULLY read what I wrote about bonding everything together by SHORT, FAT COPPER. That means a foot or two of #12 run DIRECTLY from the computer to the radio, another from the computer; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00100.html (8,481 bytes)
12. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:07:01 -0600; Yep. While I believe that it *will* pass audio to the transmitter even if the audio comes from my mouth and not WinWarbler, that's NOT what I'm doing. I'm simply trying to operate 'phone with the DK2; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00101.html (9,547 bytes)
13. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:08:56 -0600; Done. It's braid from each component (PC, PS, DK, radio) to the copper bus bar on the back of the shelf and braid to the rod outside. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ______; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00102.html (8,888 bytes)
14. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:47:50 -0800; On 12/19/2013 11:08 AM, Peter Laws wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote: \ Go back and CAREFULLY read what I wrote about bonding everything together by; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00103.html (9,613 bytes)
15. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Ed Douglass <efdouglass37@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:50:33 -0600; I would like Jim Brown to respond: does running fat copper from each piece of equipment to a bus bar (as Peter Laws says he is doing) comply with your direction to run fat copper between each piece o; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00104.html (9,780 bytes)
16. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:25:44 -0800; On 12/19/2013 11:50 AM, Ed Douglass wrote: I would like Jim Brown to respond: does running fat copper from each piece of equipment to a bus bar (as Peter Laws says he is doing) comply with your direc; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00105.html (12,721 bytes)
17. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Dale <svetanoff@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:42:59 -0600 (GMT-06:00); Peter, You mention use of braid to the ground rod outside. That's OK if the braid is encased within some sort of weather-proof cover, such as shrink tubing. The problem with braid that is exposed to; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00106.html (10,012 bytes)
18. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:55:51 -0600; Fair enough. I'll add that to the to-do list ... because I haven't messed with it since I put it in ~7 years ago. Hey, so how would one measure whether or not a ground is good? Is that doable? With a; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00107.html (8,647 bytes)
19. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:39:38 +0000; I second the motion to absolutely avoid braid outdoors for any RF site for many reasons including external rectification issues from corrosion. We even avoid it indoors at our work comm sites. Commer; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00108.html (11,815 bytes)
20. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:19:49 -0800; On 12/19/2013 1:39 PM, EDWARDS, EDDIE J wrote: But for anything connected to RF equipment, daisy chaining violates the "guidelines" and specs for single-point grounding systems. This may be acceptabl; /archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00109.html (8,941 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]