- 1. [RFI] Excellent RFI notes by ON4WW (score: 1)
- Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:03:27 -0600
- http://www.on4ww.be/emi-rfi.html _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
- /archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00150.html (6,443 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RFI] Excellent RFI notes by ON4WW (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:58:21 -0800
- Yes, this is truly excellent work. Required reading for anyone active on the ham bands. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.c
- /archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00154.html (7,039 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RFI] Excellent RFI notes by ON4WW (score: 1)
- Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:14:34 EST
- In the spirit of passing on stories of odd sources of RFI, here is one that was recently solved at K8AZ: For several years we had intermittent problems of interstation interference at Tom's Multiop c
- /archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00156.html (9,512 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RFI] Excellent RFI notes by ON4WW (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:53:58 -0800
- Great story! Many thanks. One thought, however. I STRONGLY object to use of the word "overload" to describe every case of RFI to equipment, because it's counterproductive. That is, it doesn't get int
- /archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00157.html (8,736 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RFI] Excellent RFI notes by ON4WW (score: 1)
- Author: "Wes Attaway \(N5WA\)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:18:33 -0600
- I think Jim's explanation of this is very good. It is clear and to the point. It should give the tinkerers in the crowd a lot of food for thought. -- Wes Attaway (N5WA) -- 1138 Waters Edge Circle - S
- /archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00158.html (9,806 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RFI] Excellent RFI notes by ON4WW (score: 1)
- Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 09:52:15 -0500
- In an engineering environment, you are completely correct, Jim. However, in terms of discussing interference from licensed transmitters, the use of that simple term is an important way of differenti
- /archives//html/RFI/2010-12/msg00159.html (12,338 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu