Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Handheld\s+Rx\s+for\s+Topband\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Handheld\s+Rx\s+for\s+Topband\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Handheld Rx for Topband (score: 1): Author: G8EWT <g8ewt@diacon.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:30:25 -0800; Apologies but not exactly rfi but similar. Like practically everyone else I'm waging a constant war against the QRM found in modern day residential areas. I've often thought that it would be much eas; /archives//html/RFI/2010-03/msg00035.html (6,885 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Handheld Rx for Topband (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:10:05 -0500; The only thing I can think of off the top of my head is possibly the little Yaesu QRP transceiver that will also take batteries. IIRC it will receive all modes from the BC band up through the 440 ban; /archives//html/RFI/2010-03/msg00036.html (8,508 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Handheld Rx for Topband (score: 1): Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:43:40 +0000; The little Grundig G5 is good for that. Does am/fm/sw and has dsb with a bfo, so its not real good for ssb unless the band is fairly wide open, though it does have a 'narrow' filter setting. There ar; /archives//html/RFI/2010-03/msg00037.html (8,743 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] Handheld Rx for Topband (score: 1): Author: dgsvetan@rockwellcollins.com; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:38:17 -0600; Graham, First, I'd suggest you check out radio dealers there in the UK to see what they carry in the way of SWL portables. Since you are coming Stateside soon, you may also wish to check out two deal; /archives//html/RFI/2010-03/msg00038.html (9,939 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] Handheld Rx for Topband (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:10:15 EST; I've used an Icom IC-R10 for following noise, and have had good luck with it. I assume current versions of the radio would be fine. Keep in mind that with the rubber duck antenna provided you won't h; /archives//html/RFI/2010-03/msg00039.html (8,390 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] Handheld Rx for Topband (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:06:58 -0800; The recommendations for the consumer products like the Grundigs are good. I don't have one of those, but I have a Kenwood VHF/UHF talkie that receives all the way down to 500 kHz. Below 10 MHz, it au; /archives//html/RFI/2010-03/msg00046.html (8,215 bytes)
7. [RFI] Handheld Rx for Topband (score: 1): Author: G8EWT <g8ewt@diacon.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:37:23 -0800; Many thanks to everyone who replied to my mail. It has been interesting reading your responses. I've decided to buy the radio from Nevada that Fraser suggested; it's more expensive than what I'd hope; /archives//html/RFI/2010-03/msg00069.html (8,822 bytes)
8. Re: [RFI] Handheld Rx for Topband (score: 1): Author: kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:41:33 -0500; I live out in the country so do not face the common QRM of close-in neighborhoods. It has always occurred to me that a BIG amp and a directional antenna might simplify the tracking of QRM sources. RF; /archives//html/RFI/2010-03/msg00070.html (8,677 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]