Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+RFI\s+\-\s+A\s+Losing\s+Battle\s*$/: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:30:24 -0700
Can you expand on why the FCC failed to follow up on Home Depot? Also, congratulations on Walmart, I had not heard of that one... THANK YOU! 73, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Volu
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00124.html (21,461 bytes)

22. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:32:17 -0700
Ed, Keep at it, the ARRL, and you, are helping the RIF issues, even if in small increments, all changes that reduce RFI are good. 73, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Volunteer Exami
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00125.html (21,531 bytes)

23. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:54:25 -0400
One issue that pops up in terms of enforcement is the ability to even make a complaint - especially with respect to neighbors. If you live in a HOA, your ability to demand changes to a neighbor's RF
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00126.html (24,315 bytes)

24. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:29:10 -0500
The bets advice I've heard in this regard is the cautionary "Could be arcing or overheating," because it truly *could* be (you don't yet know).  Then, you're doing them a favor! Kim N5OP On 9/23/2020
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00127.html (24,583 bytes)

25. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:14:05 -0700
That is a choice the ham made by living in an HOA, and hence, not as much of a driver I would expect, as say a ham that does not live in an HOA. We are in the process of looking for a new place, and
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00128.html (25,453 bytes)

26. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:25:27 -0700
Yup... I have ended maybe 20 to 35 RFI issues, (over the past 10 years), and in all cases but two, have had no issues. In both cases, a letter from the FCC corrected the issue. I approach with a port
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00129.html (27,412 bytes)

27. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:57:48 -0400
Depending on where you live, it is not really a choice. Virtually all new construction is HOA controlled property. 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@co
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00130.html (30,656 bytes)

28. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:18:00 -0700
Respectfully, don't buy new if that is your only choice... It is almost always a choice for the Amateur, not a good one granted, but for the most part the Amateur has a choice. You may have to balanc
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00131.html (36,653 bytes)

29. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Charles Gallo <charlie@thegallos.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:22:55 -0400
73 Rich NN3W You do have 2 choices - 1)Old construction or 2)Don't live there -- Charles Gallo http://www.thegallos.com _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00132.html (10,086 bytes)

30. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:37:39 +0000
It really is not that simple. I own "old construction" and my house is in pretty constant need of maintenance. Some people want a new home and in some areas, all of those come with CC&Rs. In some are
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00133.html (11,245 bytes)

31. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:36:10 -0400
I get that the old timers on here see ham radio and family life as a zero sum game, but the fact of the matter is that in a LOT of areas, you cannot find a suitable house for a family which does not
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00134.html (11,199 bytes)

32. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:44:10 -0700
Does anyone know where the ARRL is in the representation of HOA restrictions to congress in hopes of a modification to the rules governing antenna placement? 73, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.n
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00135.html (12,061 bytes)

33. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:48:41 -0400
Yep, I get that. But as we know 1) the lower your antenna is to the ground, the more RFI and man made noise that antenna is going to be subjected to, and 2) some HOAs are absurd enough to expressly f
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00136.html (12,943 bytes)

34. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Gedas <w8bya@mchsi.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:43:57 -0400
Just because the Communist Committee does not permit having an outdoor antenna they cannot prevent you from installing an antenna in your attic, just for one example of possibilities to still operate
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00137.html (12,268 bytes)

35. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Gedas <w8bya@mchsi.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:52:49 -0400
So please do not take this the wrong way but I do not believe there are any HOA's that tell you that you cannot have an indoor antenna.  AND, if they did, AND you agreed with those moronic terms (whi
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00138.html (13,905 bytes)

36. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 19:11:17 -0700
"If you live in a HOA, your ability to demand changes to a neighbor's RF emitting devices gets kind of diminished given the fact that many amateurs aren't supposed to even have antennas with which th
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00142.html (10,091 bytes)

37. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:30:29 +0000
I don't know why the FCC didn't follow up, but the lack of follow-up was on our end. A lot was going on at the time. Now that we can test again, I want to pick up on this, so poor W1VLF is going to h
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00146.html (25,332 bytes)

38. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:31:52 +0000
As I said in another email, a chess game is not usually won in a single grand move. It is a gradual accumulation of advantage. I make those moves within the realm of the achievable and that sets the
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00147.html (24,944 bytes)

39. Re: [RFI] RFI - A Losing Battle (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:33:23 -0700
Whatever you guys are doing, please, please keep it up!! :) 73, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, T
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00148.html (22,389 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 39
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu