Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Samsung\s+isn\'t\s+completely\s+RF\s+quiet\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Samsung\s+isn\'t\s+completely\s+RF\s+quiet\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Samsung isn't completely RF quiet (score: 1): Author: "Mel Crichton" <kj9c@iquest.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:38:45 -0500; Just to reiterate my comments from 2 years ago... Samsung high-end energy-efficient super-(audio) quiet refrigerator creates extremely strong RFI every 5 KHz.....it's from the compressor, not the dis; /archives//html/RFI/2013-09/msg00051.html (8,127 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Samsung isn't completely RF quiet (score: 1): Author: Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:47:48 -0700; Hams are a small minority. Samsung wouldn't even notice. I only buy my electronics from brick-and-mortar stores with good return policies, so I can return them if they generate RFI. I think do a thor; /archives//html/RFI/2013-09/msg00052.html (8,778 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Samsung isn't completely RF quiet (score: 1): Author: Cortland Richmond <ka5s@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:48:21 -0400; Mel, I'm not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. Read Part 15, and your state laws regarding a seller's implied warranty of serviceability. According to Part 15, harmful intereference is a conditi; /archives//html/RFI/2013-09/msg00054.html (8,654 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] Samsung isn't completely RF quiet (score: 1): Author: dalej <dj2001x@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:43:41 -0500; I doubt FM systems will be affected, besides most states are now on digital, so they won't be of much help, IMHO, unfortunately. I think we are alone in this battle against the consumer junk that is; /archives//html/RFI/2013-09/msg00055.html (9,541 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]