Hi, I should have qualified my "runs so poorly" statement, or left it out entirely as it was peripheral to my point. The uploading log-jam problem was fixed a while back and there is new TQSL softwar
Someone needs to point out that the emperor [still] has no clothes. Rick, Bob and Dave have done a marvelous job rebooting Trusted QSL and expensive new hardware has restored the original rapid proce
It's easy to hide a problem by spending $$$ to move it to faster hardware. To date nothing significant has been done to resolve what the LotW Advisory Committee calls LotW's "substantial technical de
Hi Scott, I concur with your findings. Digital folks really like eQSL, as do I. A lot of folks seem to vehemently dislike it, but I like to see QSLs and save my favorites into a folder and run it as
My experience with QSLs is that I have a 35% QSL rate per QSO with eQSL, 25% with LoTW and 4% with paper. Many of those are duplicates. I mostly work digital, using SSB only for contests. I am a firm
As long as you can fish for QSLs with it I'm not interested. Otherwise it's fine. I have, waiting for me to do something about them, 1331 "eQSLs" waiting in my inbox. One of them is from a 4Z. It's b
Peter Laws wrote, in part "...I've never worked a 4Z or any other 4X station, so that would be a real treat. Fix that and I'll sign up." I fail to see any difference than if that *4Z* card showed up
The likelihood of Fishing For QSLs is much lower where there is cost to the fisherman as there would be even if the card goes VIA BURO. With LOTW's model, it's impossible without cooperation of both