Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+New\s+Winlink\s+usage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+New\s+Winlink\s+usage\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:18:05 -0500; I found that the AR15 guys are doing some Winmor/P2P work off the Winlink grid. See: http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=10 <http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=10&f=22&t=665066> &f=22&t=66; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00297.html (7,079 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:29:02 -0500; Sorry I messed up the link its: http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=10&f=22&t=665066 I found that the AR15 guys are doing some Winmor/P2P work off the Winlink grid. See: http://www.ar15.com/arch; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00298.html (7,388 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:42:10 -0400; Of course the frequency they are using is absolutely a no-no for unattended operations unless they're limiting the connects to WINMOR 500 (450 Hz). On the other hand that doesn't stop other winlink.o; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00299.html (8,243 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:28:36 -0500; There's a lot more out there <http://www.thesurvivalistblog.net/rms-express-secure-email-over-amateur-radio/> The boat cruising forums are loaded with helpful hints on how to use, abuse, the system.; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00301.html (8,167 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:10:45 -0500; Hi Ron, Very interesting. I love the part where he states: "WinLink 2000 ... combination of free software and inexpensive equipment added to your existing Amateur Radio station will allow you to send; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00302.html (9,245 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: nq4u@mtars.org; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 21:40:37 +0000; I have been following this thread with great interest and some of the comments really surprise me. Especially the comments about interference being caused by the unattended WINLINK RMS. Now as for me; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00304.html (8,890 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:54:38 -0500; If the RMS had working busy channel detection and actually had it enabled, against the directive of the network admin, the connection should not take place if the frequency is occupied. I could be wr; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00305.html (9,492 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: ham <ham@odsgc.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:09:16 -0500; Soooo all that new mult-tone activity is NOT US hams but operators from other countries.. they seem to have very strong signals in DM97nx Using HRD-DM780? I am unable to decode 95% of these signals.; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00306.html (10,325 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:28:10 -0400; So when station WD#??? calls RMS AA#?? then who is actually causing the interference? Well let's see if my old thinking is correct or not -- I think it would be the station that initiated the call to; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00308.html (9,938 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 21:18:57 -0400; Here's an illustrative failure scenario: 1. A station in Pittsburgh is in a digital mode QSO with a station in San Francisco. 2. A Winlink user in South Carolina listens, doesn't hear the station in; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00312.html (10,021 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 09:15:43 -0500; Which rule do you claim these hosts meet? Either mailhosts are an "automatically controlled digital station" under 97.221, and hence are limited in bandwidth and by band plan, or they are being remot; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00317.html (8,901 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:55:13 +0000; Actually, I thought the point that NQ4U was trying to make is that much of the time when there's an issue with Winlink QRM in North America, it's likely because an actual human simply clicked "connec; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00318.html (10,199 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:20:00 -0400; With Winlink.org recommending system operators disable channel busy detection and many system operators *advertising* PACTOR 3 and/or WINMOR 1600 support on frequencies outside the automatic control; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00319.html (10,356 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:43:43 -0500; I saw a winlink (it was pactor of some flavor but since you can't decode the stuff, you don't really know) session fire up in the middle of a big dxpedition pileup a few weeks back - on 17m. There we; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00324.html (12,516 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:12:16 +0000; I like to give people the benefit of the doubt. In some circles, there is a saying: never attribute to malice that which can be attributed to stupidity. As we are supposed to be self-policing service; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00325.html (9,915 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:23:56 +0000; I don't think anyone's saying that. The most likely explanation for what was observed, however, was that someone keyed up without listening (or simply not caring, or to get his jollies by creating ad; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00326.html (10,435 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:35:10 -0400; I saw the identical situation this afternoon on 17 meters. 5Z4/LA4GHA had been on 18.106 working a pile-up on RTTY about 20:30z ... around 22:00 some PACTOR 2 signal fires up zero beat with 5Z4/LA4GH; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00327.html (13,397 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:41:56 -0400; Why is winlink.org *not* enforcing the rules on its members and participants? The most likely explanation, since they recommend that busy channel detection be disabled, is that they feel their opera; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00328.html (11,394 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:28:57 -0500; Come on now. When the op took the Tech/General cram course at the boat shop, he was told that 18 MHz was "the quiet channel". How was he supposed to know it was in use with the volume down??? He was; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00329.html (9,420 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:50:17 -0500; You guys going to Dayton may want to ask the ARRL about enforcement face to face, wear your buttons. ARRL has adopted Winlink as part of their emcomm program, they have also asked the FCC for more vi; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00331.html (10,647 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]