Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+No\s+599\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+No\s+599\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] No 599 (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:49:25 -0500; How about if we just send in our Cabillo with the received exchange. If after repeated tries there is no 599 in the exchange, then no 599 in the Cabrillo. e.g. regular correct exchange Cabrillo: QSO:; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00172.html (6,918 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] No 599 (score: 1): Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:00:29 -0400; The log submission robot will not accept QSO lines with missing fields like RST. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00173.html (7,970 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]