Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+QSL\'ing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+QSL\'ing\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] QSL'ing (score: 1): Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 06:22:50 -0600; Hey folks, we need to remind new hams, especially new RTTY'ers of the coutesy and tradition of QSL'ing. In the last two weeks, I've received a dozen or so QSL's in the mail direct from apparently new; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00555.html (7,252 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] QSL'ing (score: 1): Author: "Andy GD0TEP" <andy@gd0tep.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:33:12 -0000; People who send me direct QSLs without return postage, get theirs back via the buro system. Even if they asked for direct in return. A lot of guys in the states often send 2 $ for postage, even thoug; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00560.html (6,683 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] QSL'ing (score: 1): Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 9:22:53 -0500; I agree totally Tom. I QSL every new contact on every band in the US with a SASE. And I QSL direct to every country on every band with return envelopes and postage until I have the country confirmed.; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00569.html (9,051 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] QSL'ing (score: 1): Author: Barry Murrell <zs2ez@axxess.co.za>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:51:27 +0200; Despite the (deservedly) poor reputation of ZS stations IRO QSL'ing, I reply to every QSL received, without fail. I feel it is poor manners for anyone not to respond to a QSL request that includes an; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00572.html (10,322 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] QSL'ing (score: 1): Author: "Charles Morrison" <cfmorris@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:57:12 -0600; Tom, Im with you on this and I too have received numerous qsl cards following contests requesting La for qsl and such. The worst are the ones with a stamp and a sticker on the back of the qsl, sent a; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00580.html (9,996 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] QSL'ing (score: 1): Author: w2nra@optonline.net; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:51:34 -0500; Hi Barry, And thank you for the LotW QSL and a new one on RTTY that I received today. 73 Art W2NRA -- Original Message -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contes; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00583.html (8,133 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] QSL'ing (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:21:18 -0500 (EST); I have little business commenting on QSLing, because I'm WAY behind, just because of "life". But I did want to comment on this: Tom, Im with you on this and I too have received numerous qsl cards fol; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00585.html (8,312 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] QSL'ing (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:36:00 -0600; If I got 50 cards a week, or maybe even half that, and they were all post cards, I might get annoyed ... But I'd also make sure that my qrz.com entry (and other places) said "SASE ONLY". If you want; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00633.html (8,321 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]