Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+\&\s+Digital\s+Interference\s+problems\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems (score: 1)
Author: RLVZ--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 12:52:07 -0500
I'll say the "street goes both ways"! I received interference all weekend from Non-RTTY Digital signals while I was operating in the so called RTTY band. Fact is, the RTTY band is far too narrow duri
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00055.html (7,260 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems (score: 1)
Author: " pcooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:06:54 -0800
Hi all, I do understand the situation from both sides, as I use JT65 as well (occasionally), but this is not a situation limited to an argument between RTTY and JTx users. During a CW contest, the RT
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00057.html (8,044 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 15:14:45 -0500
Fact is, the RTTY band is far too narrow during major RTTY Contests such as the ARRL RU and the upcoming CQ WPX RTTY Test. That may be true ... but does not grant you, or anyone else, the right to a
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00070.html (10,088 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:25:09 -0800
<listen or a QRL? In their mode. Joe you are a hoot. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00072.html (7,760 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:33:54 -0800
Be sure to do a QRL for the QRSS folks as well... -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net for MixW support see; http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/in
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00073.html (8,785 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 15:34:39 -0500
... and what is a "hoot" about good operating practice or have RTTY operators forgotten their manners? 73, ... Joe, W4TV Joe you are a hoot. _______________________________________________ RTTY maili
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00074.html (8,219 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:19:16 -0800
"QRL? in their mode" In other words, given that all digital modes are permitted within the spectrum allocated to digital modes, and someone may be listening to a transmission I can't hear, and if I c
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00085.html (9,395 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 20:41:27 -0500
Neither JT65, JT9, PSK31, PSK63, nor PSK125 sound like "random noise". All have a distinctive "sound" and are clearly identifiable on a waterfall or spectrum display. It should even be possible to ma
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00087.html (9,697 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 18:16:38 -0800
My point exactly. 1. If it sounds like something, it probably is something. 2. If you send QRL? and you hear something, assume it means "in use". 3. If you are using a frequency, and you hear somethi
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00088.html (9,795 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems (score: 1)
Author: Rich <rwnewbould@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:25:25 -0500
I have no argument with your concern of QRM, but whether the unknown station actually heard something is speculation and not a scientific evaluation. If the person heard him he is wrong. If he truly
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00089.html (11,873 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:33:17 -0500
It is a bit difficult for JT65/JT9 to generate "noise" on demand. Those protocols will only start transmitting at one second after the top of a minute. A RTTY contester who tunes on a frequency at xx
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00090.html (10,397 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 23:13:51 -0800
A note Joe: A bit ago you were saying that these modes could not be heard... Now we can even ID them by ear... -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net for
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00099.html (11,899 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] RTTY & Digital Interference problems (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 01:25:04 -0600
If RM11708 passes, and it looks like it will, the JT65 guys will look back on RTTY contest interference as "the good old days." The worst case is that the upper band segment fills up with the pactor
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00100.html (12,582 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu