Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+SOUND\s+CARDS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+SOUND\s+CARDS\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: N6OJ <n6oj@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:56:09 -0700; Hi All Can anybody tell me if there is a difference in demodulation quality between the $29.95 special sound card and the $500.00 super sound card So many choices so little knowledge Thanks Chuck N6O; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00217.html (6,404 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:29:35 -0700; On Jul 20, 2004, at 3:56 PM, N6OJ wrote: Can anybody tell me if there is a difference in demodulation quality between the $29.95 special sound card and the $500.00 super sound card I have compared th; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00218.html (9,401 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:41:35 +0100; Kok Chen wrote: If the weakest detectable audio signal from the rig (post AGC) is at least 5% of the max audio from the rig (i.e., 26 dB range or a loss of 4 bits full scale for the weak signal), I d; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00224.html (9,675 bytes)
4. [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: "radioman" <radioman@semarg.ath.cx>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:48:57 -0400; Sri about this being a old thread.. I was looking for the survey on what sound cards were the best and second best and so forth.. I know someone here did that survey, can someone point me in the dire; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00088.html (6,440 bytes)
5. [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: "radioman" <radioman@semarg.ath.cx>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:36:56 -0400; Yeah i understand that BUT... there were better cards for better noise figures, and decoding, and there was a survey done, looks like i'll have to go back if theres a way to and find the post's on th; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00092.html (7,750 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:40:56 -0700 (PDT); I believe that N4IY did measurements and found that the Turtle Beach Santa Cruz had the best measured specs. He may have lost his data in a hard-drive crash. My TBSC is still in the box, hope to get; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00093.html (7,304 bytes)
7. Fw: [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: "radioman" <radioman@semarg.ath.cx>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:58:33 -0400; Tnks for the reply Jim.. where did U get yours? and can I ask how many coins? Tony Santa _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00094.html (8,232 bytes)
8. [RTTY] SOUND CARDS (score: 1): Author: Wayne Matlock <beam_spinner@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 16:24:11 -0700 (PDT); How do you dis-able an on-board soundcard? (permanately), Wayne, K7WM -- Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, and more! _______________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00133.html (6,762 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] SOUND CARDS (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 18:29:45 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- In my computer at least, it can be done in the BIOS. YMMV. Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http:; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00134.html (6,484 bytes)
10. [RTTY] sound cards (score: 1): Author: "charter" <willmarbrowns@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:19:15 -0600; just wondering what the sound card of choice might be now. it used the be the 'turtle beach'. 73, Bruce ke0lx _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com htt; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-11/msg00019.html (6,093 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] sound cards (score: 1): Author: "Ekki Plicht (DF4OR)" <ep@plicht.de>; Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 19:51:26 +0100; And now it's one integrated into a microHAM USB device. 73, Ekki, DF4OR Attn: I am biased, I am a reseller for those devices. Still, I am convinced that they are superb. _____________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-11/msg00020.html (6,437 bytes)
12. [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: rick darwicki <n6pe@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:22:59 -0800 (PST); Gents and ladies if you are out there, I just ordered a little SoftRock SDR card and have been reading about the performance with onboard vs PCI 24-bit cards. The standard 16-bit 48 khz motherboard s; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00212.html (6,834 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:08:01 -0700; -- I have one computer with on-board 16 bit sound, and a Soundblaster Live! 24 bit pci card. I have watched those two devices side-by-side on all kinds of rtty signals, and can find absolutely no dif; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00214.html (7,871 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: Fabi va2up <va2up@live.ca>; Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:21:48 -0500; Hi Rick, I share the same experience as Dave. I had high hopes in trying out a Rolland external usb 24 bit soundcard, thinking that maybe it would pick up less noise then the onboard card and noticed; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00215.html (9,624 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:29:58 -0500; SDR operation is a very different paradigm than decoding the relatively narrow band audio spectrum for MMTTY, etc. The detected IF noise in the line output of most current transceivers is well above; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00216.html (9,850 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:04:32 -0800; Hi Rick, IMHO, it is all about (blocking) dynamic range. Roughly speaking... If you are using a narrow I.F. filter where the demodulator is only seeing a single RTTY signal, you really need only abou; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00217.html (12,311 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:23:38 -0800; I had earlier sent this to Rick and copied the reflector, but since it hasn't appeared, here it is again. -- Hi Rick, IMHO, it is all about (blocking) dynamic range. Roughly speaking... If you are us; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00218.html (12,355 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:26:12 -0800; Oops :-) :-) Sorry for the repeat, folks. I guess the Reflector is just slow today? 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.co; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00219.html (7,537 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>; Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:18:51 -0500; The performance requirements for an SDR and for RTTY are totally different. In an SDR, the number of bits of resolution translates to dynamic range - the more bits, the more dynamic range. 16 bits is; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00221.html (9,649 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] Sound Cards (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:47:12 -0500; The above is very useful for dual diversity when you have two independent receivers fed from two independent antennas, but you can also run multiple copies of MMTTY from the usual receiver's single m; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00222.html (8,258 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]