- 1. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 14:57:30 -0500
- Hi Dick Thanks for the reminder and tips. Let me add one additional tip: Many of us think the "DE" is not necessary, and can even be confusing when copy is difficult because DE = DELAWARE. I haven't
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00004.html (11,122 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 14:11:22 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Nobody actually sends TOO. That is what prints when the FIGS shift character in front of 599 is lost or garbled. If everyone would do two things those mis-prints would be gre
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00010.html (8,522 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 17:41:38 -0500
- MM is similar....will also display in a small letters/figures window in the digi window.... _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesti
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00012.html (7,010 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: Steve **KT0DX** <kt0dx@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 01:50:16 +0000
- Another tip I would suggest is when you set up your function keys to put in at least 2 or 3 spaces before the receive command. I would also recommend putting 2 spaces after the transmit command also.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00015.html (11,518 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 18:40:20 -0800
- If you answer someone's CQ and you don't hear him come back to someone, call him again fairly quickly. There is nothing more frustrating for a CQing station than having two people answer, with no cop
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00016.html (8,467 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: Harvey Luke <hdluke@centurytel.net>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 21:20:10 -0600
- All good points, Dick. I'm looking forward to my 4th RTTY RU in a row. Don't feel bad. I'm just using an OCF Windom here @ 50 ft. but I still have fun. 73 Harvey, KM4JA diddle-diddle ________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00017.html (9,661 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 20:10:38 -0800
- REPLY: Nobody actually sends TOO. That is what prints when the FIGS shift character in front of 599 is lost or garbled. If everyone would do two things those mis-prints would be greatly reduced: 1. B
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00018.html (9,321 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: Arpad <yu7am@open.telekom.rs>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 20:22:34 +0000
- When calling CQ please print CQ after your call sign !! example: CQ CQ RU TEST DE YT2U YT2U CQ -- 73 de Arpad YT2U www.qslnet.de/yt2u _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00021.html (12,007 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 03:28:09 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Agreed, that is bad practice, but if you're using N1MM Logger, there is a check box which will remove excess line feeds. It's under the setup function in the Digital Interfac
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00022.html (10,145 bytes)
- 10. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 03:33:27 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Even better is to put a line feed after the TX command: {TX}{ENTER}CQ CQ RU {CALL} {CALL} CQ {RX} That ensures your macro will print on a new line and thus won't word-wrap ri
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00023.html (8,774 bytes)
- 11. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:03:40 -0700
- I can think of two reasons why sending DE can help (regardless of the WriteLog behavior). Assume that SO2R is not an issue at this point: 1. By transmitting more (i.e. sending DE rather than not), yo
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00030.html (8,985 bytes)
- 12. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:52:39 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Good point, but I believe the critical thing here is not how long the transmission is but rather how long the listening period is. I believe the listening period between CQs
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00031.html (8,536 bytes)
- 13. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 15:07:14 -0500
- Like I said earlier, I haven't sent a "DE" in years in RTTY contests, but if we ever get Skimmer for RTTY, I promise to start. Until then, I hope nobody sends DE unless he/she is in Delaware. Jerry W
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00032.html (8,034 bytes)
- 14. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 13:11:59 -0800
- But you also want the call itself to be short to reduce the latency to the next QSO. Ergo, short calls, repeated often. But the dead time needs to be long enough for a slow poke to respond (especiall
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00038.html (10,680 bytes)
- 15. Re: [RTTY] Suggestions for RTTY RU (score: 1)
- Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 00:31:06 +0000
- I can think of two reasons why sending DE can help (regardless of the 1. By transmitting more (i.e. sending DE rather than not), you're If you want to increase duty cycle, I gently suggest sending so
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00045.html (9,225 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu