Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+To\s+DE\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+DE\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+To\s+DE\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+DE\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:22:55 -0700; The big one is this weekend, CQWW RTTY. http://www.cqwwrtty.com/ Here are some tips that will make everyone's weekend more fun. To DE or not to DE. It depends, but mostly not. Almost all the time, wh; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00108.html (7,077 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Michael Haack <mikehaack@aol.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:36:08 -0500; I know I'm probably beating a dead horse, But doesn't some contest software and the Skimmer specially look for the DE to identify call-signs? 73 Mike, WB9B Here are some tips that will make everyone'; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00109.html (8,314 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:47:18 -0700; Writelog will look for DE and highlight calls. The problem is that it will also highlight junk. I find that distracting so I usually turn this feature off. - jeff wk6i (in the WW from W7RN) -- Jeff S; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00110.html (9,622 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:17:07 -0700; I know I'm probably beating a dead horse, But doesn't some contest software I think that is mostly a thing of the past. I know that N1MM Logger does not look for DE. I never send DE and I don't seem; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00111.html (7,995 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:42:42 -0400 (EDT); If you're from Delaware, you may use DE to your heart's content and everyone will love you for it. No one else in the known universe should use it for any purpose. GL in the contest. 73, Kermit, AB1J; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00112.html (7,609 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Roy Drake <W3RTY@roadrunner.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:46:53 -0400; Us old farts will remember the program WF1B. It needed DE to highlite a call. Not needed now (if you're still using WF1B, Tuff). 73 Roy W3RTY (KA3JFI..old fart's old call) I know I'm probably beating; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00113.html (9,211 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:22:12 -0500; Great advice! 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie If you're from Delaware, you may use DE to your heart's content and everyone will love you for it. No one else in the known universe; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00114.html (8,361 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:08:53 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: A few subtleties for those who are millisecond counters: 1. Don't use ? in your macros. QTH QTH is just as clear as QTH? QTH? Likewise NR NR or AGN AGN and i; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00115.html (8,879 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Elmar PD3EM <info@pd3em.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:10:43 +0200; Hi all, I think it's always a combination of sending as quick and a clearly as possible. While doing S&P I often turn into the end of a QSO where the running station is ending with just his call sign; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00116.html (10,979 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:43:00 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: May I suggest instead of DE PD3EM PD3E just send your call three times instead of two and eliminate the "DE". I think you'll have better results, especially; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00117.html (8,386 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: "Stephen M. Shearer" <WB3LGC@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 08:23:22 -0400; No matter what I do.. WB3LGC 599 05 DE .. get questions... Shorter seems better and depending upon the contest exchange it can be worse... The big one is this weekend, CQWW RTTY. http://www.cqwwrtty.; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00133.html (9,125 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 09:26:14 -0500; It's very simple. 1. If DE as a state name can be a required part of the contest exchange... 2. Then under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should DE be used as part of the exchange. 3. There are no exceptions. Gene; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00134.html (10,590 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 07:42:56 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Try WB3LGC 599 DE DE 05 That should be clear. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lis; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00135.html (8,285 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 21:50:49 -0400; A particularly annoying example: Late this afternoon a few rare (for this contest) zones popped up - 12 Chile and 7 Costa Rica. The pileups are pure QRM anyway, but a number of callers decided that i; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00147.html (11,317 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: N4BE_Jim <N4BE_Jim@Yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:07:44 -0400; After building my first tube RTTY TU in 1963 and running a Model 15 and a Dx-60, I can remember actually having lengthly ragchews on 80M RTTY after school. Sad, we've come such a long way. 73 DE N4BE; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00157.html (8,146 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Keith Maton <g6nhu@me.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:39:04 +0000 (UTC); Jim, I disagree - Everything has a place and nice long chats on RTTY are absolutely fine as long as they're not during contests. I used to have lengthy ragchews after school using RTTY with a Creed 4; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00160.html (8,938 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Keith Maton <nentecular@me.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:37:48 +0000 (UTC); Jim, I disagree - Everything has a place and nice long chats on RTTY are absolutely fine as long as they're not during contests. I used to have lengthy ragchews after school using RTTY with a Creed 4; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00165.html (8,947 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:46:32 -0700; The problem is simple. That is a default macro in MMTTY. These people just were not in the contest. Not everyone is a contester and we have to share the band with them. Maybe they are not the problem; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00174.html (13,080 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:00:02 -0400; I admit to not suffering fools gladly. Even so, are people so stupid or lazy as to not think at all??? A RTTY pileup such as I heard on a single frequency lasts 30 seconds or longer before it subside; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00175.html (14,335 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] To DE or not to DE (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:47:00 -0700; During the WW I actually received this in an exchange: w9xxxx 599 04 IN AR This may mark the first time I've ever seen AR end a RTTY transmission. (Yes, I asked!) - jeff wk6i -- Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00184.html (9,776 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]