Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Two\s+NA\s+Sprint\s+Questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Two\s+NA\s+Sprint\s+Questions\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:44:37 -0400; Last night was my first NA Sprint and it was definitely different. At the start I watched a couple of exchanges to see how it flowed (wasn't able to be in the practice session) and then jumped in. Fr; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00241.html (8,809 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:56:23 -0400; with regard to the dupe, either they worked someone else, and not you before, OR they thought this contest still had the old rule, where you could work dupes as long as there were 3 qsos in between.; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00243.html (9,260 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:51:25 -0700; Yes, there were a few stations that didn't understand the QSY rule. I know it is frustrating at first because it messes up your rhythm, but then I realize that this is GOOD news that new folks are g; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00245.html (11,137 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:20:24 -0400; Ed/Jamie, Thanks for the replies and thanks for the Q's last night. I figured with folks using software, as long as it was up to date, it would tell the op it was a dup. I know N1MM did for me. I fig; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00247.html (13,565 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: Dan N9XX <dan.n9xx@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:48:59 -0500; Ahhhh, this might explain why my old, unupdated version of WriteLog (10.42c) would not indicate that a given station was a potential dupe. With only 15 QSO within 25 minutes in my log, it was pretty; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00249.html (9,497 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:08:55 -0700; Yeah, Wayne updated WriteLog for this change last summer. ;>) I put the word out on the reflectors (RTTY and CQ-Contest), but they can be easily missed. Marc Ziegler, was a NCCC member dearly loved; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00250.html (8,536 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:22:58 -0400 (EDT); And if you've got the S&P habit, taking over the frequency is not what you're used to- I know I tuned away several times, just from reflex. 73, doug world, if I answered your CQ, and it was going to; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00251.html (8,601 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: Iain MacDonnell - N6ML <ar@dseven.org>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:40:21 -0700; I actually found the "CQ" on the end quiet offensive. In my opinion, it should NOT be there. It's NOT their frequency until the QSO has been completed by me confirming the exchange. The "CQ" gives ot; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00252.html (9,311 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:08:13 -0700; I strongly agree with you, Iain. The 'CQ' or 'QRZ' at the end is a "RTTY thing" carried over from the RTTY CQ messages where common practice over the years has been to end such messages with CQ or QR; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00255.html (11,308 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: W6SX Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:04:31 -0700; I say YES! CQ at the end of an S&P exchange is confusing and invites people to jump in before the QSO is properly QSL'd. CQ at the end of a CQ is great, and I wish everyone would use it. While we're; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00256.html (8,354 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:51:29 -0600; I am on board. I don't think I had the CQ at the end of my message. I tried to look but I forgot to save my key file in N1MM and what I was using is gone. I would also like to ask that stations pleas; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00257.html (12,743 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:14:38 -0700; Well, I'll confess that I've had the 'CQ' at the end of my S&P Exchange message for the last few Sprints and I don't know what I was thinking. Clearly, I wasn't thinking. I've been doing CW and SSB S; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00258.html (10,253 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:42:00 -0400 (EDT); I was sending things twice, but part of that was because I was using a name (N1MM Logger called it a "handle") that was not usual. And I was sending it number, name, state, number, name, state, inste; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00259.html (13,131 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:30:37 -0600; And the key to know who's frequency it is in sprint is by the way the exchange should be done. Example: Me: CQ NA W0MU W0MU CQ NA ED: W0YK W0YK ME: W0YK W0MU 1 MIKE CO His call then my call says W0YK; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00260.html (11,087 bytes)
15. [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: "Darl Deeds" <ddeeds@thewavz.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:28:00 -0400; Sounds like a plan but can we also eliminate the Benjamin Franklin quotes from the end of all these messages. It is just as wasteful. Darl NA8W _______________________________________________ RTTY ma; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00262.html (7,849 bytes)
16. [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: "Darl Deeds" <ddeeds@thewavz.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:11:50 -0400; <Those quotes are of more use than your posting.> OK, please explain the purpose. I'm open to new things that I don't understand. I read a post and then all of a sudden I'm reading a Ben Franklin quo; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00263.html (8,516 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:28:33 -0600; The quote was from my email. It is a signature. I just changed it. I failed to space between my post and the one I was responding to so the quote and the previous message all ran together. This was t; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00264.html (9,473 bytes)
18. [RTTY] Two NA Sprint Questions (score: 1): Author: "Darl Deeds" <ddeeds@thewavz.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:11:06 -0400; Thanks for the response. I guess I don't understand the reason for a signature other than name and call on the RTTY contesting forum but I'm still learning. Please use a new rope for me and I won't c; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00266.html (8,287 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]