- 1. [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:43:49 -0700
- Hi all Please, please, if I call you, work me because you are not in my log. I don't know if it was because I busted your call, or because you thought it was me you were working, but wasn't, or what.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00137.html (6,336 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:20:56 -0000
- Tom I've been inactive and I don't know all I wish I did about N1MM or WriteLog. But you can set AUTO DUPE ENABLE FALSE and log a zero pointer in TR. Can something like that be done with N1MM and Wri
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00138.html (8,276 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:45:04 -0700
- Hi Mike Yes, there is a feature in N1MM Logger, 'work dupes', that just lets you go ahead and work the dupes. It just doesn't make any sense to hold up everything to try and look up when the Q was su
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00139.html (9,457 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 22:47:01 -0400
- Tom, I agree with you and almost always do the same - just work dupe and save time for both. Except yesterday, during SCC RTTY. Several times I was called by "dupe" station. OK, I was answering, from
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00140.html (8,074 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:41:17 -0700
- I'd like to emphasize Tom's point about always work dupes that call you and don't even question it. You are not penalized and it is much faster than trying to sort it out. I'm responding to this thre
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00141.html (10,613 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: "Charles Morrison" <cfmorris@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:21:41 -0500
- Tom, As many times as I've posted about this on 3830 and in this reflector, I would like to pose the question why this is even an issue? I don't use TR or N1MM, but if this is true, then why do thes
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00142.html (8,811 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:26:23 +0100
- If a contest organizer solicits entries in a Cabrillo format, there should be no penalty for working dupes - period! Cabrillo log formats are part of a larger 'package deal' that includes re-scoring
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00144.html (9,278 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:41:51 -0700
- TR-Log is seldom used in RTTY contests, but it is common in CW and my preferred CW logger. TR-Log can be configured to automatically work dupes or to inhibit transmission when you try to work a dupe
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00146.html (11,745 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: "Charles Morrison" <cfmorris@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:02:11 -0500
- This absolutely makes sense. Being a Writelog user, I don't have the luxury of a fully functioning Enter Sends QRZ/Exchange with automatic changeover from S&P and Run. :( I'm used to entering the ca
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00147.html (11,226 bytes)
- 10. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: Chris <frisco.kid@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:08:43 -0500
- N1MM in the mmtty decode window has a user configurable color for dupes, not worked and new multi's. Makes it real easy to tune and see if you worked without having to take your hand off VFO. _______
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00148.html (12,021 bytes)
- 11. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:13:56 -0700
- Oh, yes, I understood your example. I was just pointing out that it is ALSO possible for you to call a station when they ARE in your log. But, their response should still be the same ... just work i
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00149.html (10,057 bytes)
- 12. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:33:19 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:43:49 -0700, "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@co
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00152.html (8,239 bytes)
- 13. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:18:40 -0400
- "Please, please, if I call you, work me because you are not in my log." Please, please....why is this, or something similar, posted after most every contest? I suspect that 99.9% of the subscribers,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00177.html (8,304 bytes)
- 14. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:13:53 -0700
- Hi Shelby Because it works. One of the biggest problem for a while was all the LF/CR's at the end of the macro's--having to chase callsigns and exchanges all over the screen. It was discussed here an
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00180.html (9,094 bytes)
- 15. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:25:39 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Shelby makes a good point. I'm going to start making notes on certain kinds of "offenses" and sending emails after the contest is over. 1. Running RST and exchan
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00181.html (8,878 bytes)
- 16. Re: [RTTY] dupes (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:28:28 -0700
- Hi Shelby. That sounds like a good idea. Hey, maybe now that we know that, maybe more people will do that. See, we just learned something else new :-) 73 Tom W7WHY ___________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-08/msg00182.html (8,708 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu