Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+ARRL\s+160\s+\-\s+KU8E\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+ARRL\s+160\s+\-\s+KU8E\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] ARRL 160 - KU8E (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:55:05 -0500; KU8E - SOHP - 311 QSOs / 63 sections / 11 countries -> 49,800 IC756PRO, AL811H - 500 watts , Inverted L Antenna Operated 8 hours DX worked : NA - 6Y, VP2E, KP2, KP4 SA - P4, PY EU - DL, G, LA, OK, OM; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00025.html (8,275 bytes)
2. [SECC] ARRL 160 - KU8E (score: 1): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:53:11 -0600; If your feedline changes the resonant frequency of your antenna, that is an indication that your ground radials are insufficient. The resonant frequency of a vertical or inv L will change as a functi; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00026.html (7,685 bytes)
3. [SECC] ARRL 160 - KU8E (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 19:53:52 -0500; More radials will also make the antenna more efficient, as ground losses are reduced. Placing a current choke at the feedpoint should also reduce currents on the feedline. But radials have larger ben; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00036.html (8,072 bytes)
4. [SECC] ARRL 160 - KU8E (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (k4sb@bellsouth.net); Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 05:09:23 +0000; -- While I agree with Jerry on a lot of hs points, I have to take exception to some of them. But then, lacking the information on how long Jeff's antenna for 160 was. ( 1/4 wave? ) Assuming it was a; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00041.html (9,991 bytes)
5. [SECC] ARRL 160 - KU8E (score: 1): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:46:42 -0600; K4SB wrote: I would be more comfortable with Jerry's first statement if he had said "If your feed line changes the "apparent" resonate frequency of your antenna, you've got a BIG problem. This old wi; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00043.html (10,687 bytes)
6. [SECC] ARRL 160 - KU8E (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:54:24 -0500; I thought I would mention. My antenna is a hastily put up inverted L. 50 ft vertical and 80 ft horizontal. I added some wire to the current 80 inverted L I had up. It has 4 full size 130 ft radials p; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00046.html (8,068 bytes)
7. [SECC] ARRL 160 - KU8E (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:54:54 -0500; I thought I would mention. My antenna is a hastily put up inverted L. 50 ft vertical and 80 ft horizontal. I added some wire to the current 80 inverted L I had up. It has 4 full size 130 ft radials p; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00047.html (8,050 bytes)
8. [SECC] ARRL 160 - KU8E (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:54:45 -0500; I thought I would mention. My antenna is a hastily put up inverted L. 50 ft vertical and 80 ft horizontal. I added some wire to the current 80 inverted L I had up. It has 4 full size 130 ft radials p; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00048.html (8,087 bytes)
9. [SECC] ARRL 160 - KU8E (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (k4sb@bellsouth.net); Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:05:48 +0000; Well, of course the resonant frequency will change if the feedline is part of the antenna, but under those circumstances, you are no longer discussing the original antenna. This is the old trick to s; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00051.html (9,027 bytes)
10. [SECC] ARRL 160 - KU8E (score: 1): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 18:42:15 -0600; By posing a simple example which I hoped would be obvious, I was trying to illustrate just what you said, the feedline will change the resonant frequency of the antenna in this situation. This same c; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00056.html (12,350 bytes)
11. [SECC] ARRL 160 - KU8E (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:03:54 -0500; You definitely need more radials. Like about 20 more.... They all don't have to be 130 feet. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00058.html (7,634 bytes)
12. [SECC] ARRL 160 - KU8E (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:01:38 -0500; Assuming the feedline is fully decoupled from the antenna, sure. If we put a current choke on that feedline right where it feeds the antenna, then your statement is true. However, if return currents; /archives//html/SECC/2005-12/msg00059.html (8,326 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]