Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+ARRL\s+160m\s+contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+ARRL\s+160m\s+contest\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] ARRL 160M contest (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:13:19 -0500; Hi to everyone, Missed my second CQWW SSB in a row due to work and family obligations. I am going to make sure that I do not miss the 160m contests and am advertising for good CW contesters intereste; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00110.html (6,869 bytes)
2. [SECC] ARRL 160m contest (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:02:04 -0500; Looks like a Multi operation is going to happen @ N4UK. AA4NN, AA4S and N4UK (maybe W4OC) will be trying out the new 1/4wl tower vertical and the new 600 ft NE beverage the weekend of the 7th/8th/9th; /archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00156.html (7,565 bytes)
3. [SECC] ARRL 160m contest (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN); Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:41:53 -0500 (EST); Again, my station is available for anyone who wants to put in a full time effort. 73 -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQ; /archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00157.html (8,255 bytes)
4. [SECC] ARRL 160m contest (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 07:08:55 -0500; Looking at my situation, it wouldn't take too much effort to get my 160m InvL back into operation. Would it be better for SECC if I ran a serious effort from AA4NN? 73, Joe, aa4nn -- SECC on the Web:; /archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00163.html (7,874 bytes)
5. [SECC] ARRL 160m contest (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN); Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 08:45:29 -0500 (EST); Absolutely yes!!!! But, would you have more fun? 73 Bill -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems; /archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00167.html (8,657 bytes)
6. [SECC] ARRL 160m contest (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:53:03 -0500; This is why I prefer a Multi effort. Lots more fun and a lot less boring! And I usually don't have the time to dedicate all weekend for a single op. effort. I have a prior Christmas party commitment; /archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00170.html (9,800 bytes)
7. [SECC] ARRL 160m contest (score: 1): Author: gabnjb@earthlink.net (Gary Breed); Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 16:37:05 -0500; Are there any other hotshot SECC member CW ops interested in coming by to help out from here for the ARRL 160m contest the weekend of the 7th of December? I have some out of towners interested but th; /archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00182.html (7,277 bytes)
8. [SECC] ARRL 160m Contest (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (Ken Ramirez); Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 07:22:33 -0500; Anyone interested in coming to Greenville, SC for the ARRL 160m Contest in December? The new shack above the garage is almost finished. Another 2-3 weeks and it should be ready for M/S contesting. De; /archives//html/SECC/2000-11/msg00005.html (6,657 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]