Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+CQWW\s+Error\s+rate\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+CQWW\s+Error\s+rate\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] CQWW Error rate? (score: 1): Author: gregpotter at charter.net (gregpotter at charter.net); Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 16:30:36 -0400 (EDT); Hi Folks, What would be a good "error %" in a contest like CQWW CW? % Calls copied incorrectly? % Calls not in log? Is there a club competition for "most accurate logs" or "least accurate logs"? How; /archives//html/SECC/2011-08/msg00141.html (6,982 bytes)
2. [SECC] CQWW Error rate? (score: 1): Author: Kt4zb at aol.com (Kt4zb at aol.com); Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:15:36 -0400 (EDT); Great Question Greg - I've often wondered the same. I got credit for 921 QSOs out of 926 for CQWW .1% (1) incorrect and .4% (4) not in log - lost 1 zone which really hurt. Score was dropped 1.7% Logg; /archives//html/SECC/2011-08/msg00142.html (7,660 bytes)
3. [SECC] CQWW Error rate? (score: 1): Author: k4bai at att.net (John T. Laney III); Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 21:25:18 -0400; You can be perfect or nearly perfect if all you do is S&P. You can listen to previous QSOs and later QSOs all you want until you are sure of what you are logging. If you do any amount of running, per; /archives//html/SECC/2011-08/msg00146.html (7,417 bytes)
4. [SECC] CQWW Error rate? (score: 1): Author: thompson at mindspring.com (David Thompson); Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:47:42 -0400; I agree with John's analysis of error rate. I find that working 40 or 80 SSB an error rate is increased by the Dx run station logging you when you call someone else on or near the run stations listen; /archives//html/SECC/2011-08/msg00147.html (8,152 bytes)
5. [SECC] CQWW Error rate? (score: 1): Author: k9ay at k9ay.com (K9AY); Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:40:52 -0500; In 2010 CQWW I was SOSB 160M and had 2 bad out of 64 raw QSOs = 3.13% (1 NIL, 1 busted copy). The exchange makes a difference -- in Sweepstakes CW, my error rate is 2.0 - 2.5%. ARRL 160 and it's simp; /archives//html/SECC/2011-08/msg00151.html (7,865 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]