Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Stupid\s+Question\s+\-\s+Where\s+to\s+point\s+Beam\?\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Stupid Question - Where to point Beam? (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 13:47:19 -0500
OK, I'm going to ask what may seem if not stupid, but an obvious question. After over six years contesting with single-element antennas, now that I have a beam, I don't always know where to turn it.
/archives//html/SECC/2003-04/msg00000.html (7,942 bytes)

2. [SECC] Stupid Question - Where to point Beam? (score: 1)
Author: jpryor at arches.uga.edu (Jay Pryor)
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 14:06:53 -0500
Bill, I will be interested in learning what other folks who know a whole lot more than me have to say about your question, but I'd say that you should start in the obvious directions. That is, toward
/archives//html/SECC/2003-04/msg00001.html (10,508 bytes)

3. [SECC] Stupid Question - Where to point Beam? (score: 1)
Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 14:42:45 -0500
Not as easy as it seems, eh? ;-) Entirely possible. Depends on the propagation mode. For good ol' normal F-layer skip, just pointing toward the great circle bearing normally works. But, sometimes (of
/archives//html/SECC/2003-04/msg00002.html (10,267 bytes)

4. [SECC] Stupid Question - Where to point Beam? (score: 1)
Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net)
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 16:31:53 -0500
Bill... Put a simple 2nd antenna that is multi directional,like a dipole/vertical. If you can't make the qso then turn the beam. This is what many of the people who do SO2R do... Jeff
/archives//html/SECC/2003-04/msg00003.html (9,859 bytes)

5. [SECC] Stupid Question - Where to point Beam? (score: 1)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 18:27:50 -0500
Follow the sun is effective, as you said. Remember that in the summer/spring months propagation will get wierd and will do a lot of strange things. I also suggest a non directional (as compared to a
/archives//html/SECC/2003-04/msg00004.html (11,720 bytes)

6. [SECC] Stupid Question - Where to point Beam? (score: 1)
Author: w4dd at arrl.net (Jeff)
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 19:45:17 -0500
When I only had a short tower, I had to make do with a simple dipole as the 2nd antenna. Now that the tower is a little taller (70ft), the second antenna fixed SE sure makes the slower times more pro
/archives//html/SECC/2003-04/msg00005.html (9,538 bytes)

7. [SECC] Stupid Question - Where to point Beam? (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 21:54:00 -0500
That's where I started. However, with a tribander at 50 feet, you can't always hear EU or JAs -- or perhaps they can't hear you. If the skip is short, like late afternoon on 20m, due north works well
/archives//html/SECC/2003-04/msg00006.html (9,765 bytes)

8. [SECC] Stupid Question - Where to point Beam? (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 22:00:41 -0500
I did some of that on Sunday, hitting the 80m dipole to work carribean and south american stations on 10m. Seemed to work OK. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a th
/archives//html/SECC/2003-04/msg00007.html (8,343 bytes)

9. [SECC] Stupid Question - Where to point Beam? (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 22:09:55 -0500
I agree! After using the arrangement at NQ4I's on 20m/15m/10m, the short beam pointing around 160-170 degrees is great! Allows you to pick up those carribean / south american stations without having
/archives//html/SECC/2003-04/msg00008.html (8,618 bytes)

10. [SECC] Stupid Question - Where to point Beam? (score: 1)
Author: k4bai at worldnet.att.net (John Laney)
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 09:57:22 -0500
The European "skew" path may also be open when the direct path is closed at the end of an opening, particularly on 20 meters. I made a lot of contacts stateside from NQ4I this past weekend backscatte
/archives//html/SECC/2003-04/msg00009.html (8,521 bytes)

11. [SECC] Stupid Question - Where to point Beam? (score: 1)
Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net)
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 10:14:43 -0500
W4AN is sure right about working the 3,8, and 9's on 20 meters. You could also add the 4's around the DC area and the 2 and 1 call area. Because of the poor conditions this weekend in WPX SSB it was
/archives//html/SECC/2003-04/msg00010.html (11,390 bytes)

12. [SECC] Stupid Question - Where to point Beam? (score: 1)
Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net)
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 10:16:10 -0500
If you get a tuner an all band antenna like a G5RV or zepp works pretty good for that purpose... Jeff
/archives//html/SECC/2003-04/msg00011.html (8,866 bytes)

13. [SECC] Stupid Question - Where to point Beam? (score: 1)
Author: amckay at rabun.net (McKay)
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 11:33:44 -0500
Now that the guys who really know what they are talking about have responded to Lee I feel safe in saying, yeah, they are right. I have a tribander on top of the house attached to chimney and one wir
/archives//html/SECC/2003-04/msg00013.html (8,536 bytes)

14. [SECC] Stupid Question - Where to point Beam? (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 22:29:46 -0500
I believe Bill's exact statement was something of the form: "In SS, if you aren't working 3, 8 and 9-land stations, you're losing." Isn't this how the guys in the carribean feel? Bill Coleman, AA4LR,
/archives//html/SECC/2003-04/msg00015.html (8,312 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu