Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Splitting\s+a\s+serial\s+port\s+\&\s+NETWORKING\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Splitting\s+a\s+serial\s+port\s+\&\s+NETWORKING\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Splitting a serial port & NETWORKING (score: 1): Author: roberto.soro@sia.it (Soro Roberto); Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 08:38:29 +0200; Hi all, why don't resume (and eventually do) the idea to use the TCP/IP LAN for networking, like CT does (via NETTSR)??? Nice challenge, Ron! Bob, I2WIJ mailto:i2wij@qsl.net http://www.qsl.net/i2wij/; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-06/msg00088.html (9,060 bytes)
2. [TRLog] Splitting a serial port & NETWORKING (score: 1): Author: kl7ra@ptialaska.net (KL7RA); Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 12:51:28 -0800; What is the advantage TCP/IP have over TRLog serial transfer? The big reason for CT to have a TCP/IP LAN is because CT's serial interface does not have error correction and RFI crashes the network o; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-06/msg00089.html (7,486 bytes)
3. [TRLog] Splitting a serial port & NETWORKING (score: 1): Author: balister@vt.edu (Philip Balister); Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:25:19 -0400; Most laptops have an ethernet card and not enough serial ports. I used to care, but since I found a fairly cheap serial card, I don't care as much as I did :) PCMCIA serial card that is. 73 de Philip; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-06/msg00090.html (8,302 bytes)
4. [TRLog] Splitting a serial port & NETWORKING (score: 1): Author: ua9cdc@r66.ru (Igor Sokolov); Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 00:11:17 +0600; I would like to second Bob I2WIJ as far as TCP/IP LAN is conserned. LAN cards are a lot cheaper and easier to find nowdays then additional serial ports or USB to COM converters. The network continue; /archives//html/TRLog/2002-06/msg00091.html (7,206 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]