Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+6M\s+with\s+HF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+6M\s+with\s+HF\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] 6M with HF (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:56:49 -0500; In deference to Duane, the JA's were slower into full conversion to solid state... Tube amps/drivers (hybrids) lasted a number of years after USA went all solid, beginning with TenTec. Perry w8au ___; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00392.html (7,673 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] 6M with HF (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:25:54 -0800 (PST); The JA companies were the first offer rigs with an internal antenna tuner, a memory keyer, and memories. 73s John W5TD ________________________________________________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00393.html (9,194 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] 6M with HF (score: 1): Author: "W5JMW John" <w5jmw@cableone.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:39:49 -0600; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00394.html (10,291 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] 6M with HF (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:55:44 -0500; The JA's were also the first to offer me unheard of prices for some of my boatanchors. QSOed with my old KWS1 and logged it on one of the $100 bills and pasted it in my log book ! May peel it off and; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00395.html (7,802 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] 6M with HF (score: 1): Author: ron <roncasa@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:01:21 -0500; But they used "mechanical" means of operation; their "auto tuner" for example, took a long to tune because it used motors! geesh! Even their "QSK" was mechanical and still is! U S of A came out out w; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00397.html (8,562 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] 6M with HF (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:00:24 -0800 (PST); Now I could be wrong (it has been known to happen), but I think the first radio with a built in Keyer was the Yaesu FT901DM, and the first rig with a built in antenna tuner was the Kenwood TS930SAT.; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00402.html (8,981 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] 6M with HF (score: 1): Author: "W5JMW John" <w5jmw@cableone.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:14:44 -0600; No John,I think the first rig,which was american was a signal one cx7.It had dual vfo's(though not the first,that was a johnson) and dual receive(again not the first,that was a halli sr-400/vfo) but; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00403.html (10,221 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] 6M with HF (score: 1): Author: "W5JMW John" <w5jmw@cableone.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:21:40 -0600; actually the dual vfo's came on the cosmophone,hallicrafters had the fpm 200.But I think it was a johnson,avenger maybe,probebly wrong that was first.The hallicrafters sr-400 with the remote vfo gave; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00404.html (10,185 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] 6M with HF (score: 1): Author: "W5JMW John" <w5jmw@cableone.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:23:43 -0600; John,you are right on the memory channel.I think it might have been the ft-107 But in that same era.The ft-707.107 901,902 etc had that option..73 john -- Original Message -- From: "John Geiger" <joh; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00405.html (9,761 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] 6M with HF (score: 1): Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:54:26 +0100; In my opinion we have some of our priorities wrong. I think we are placing too high of value on being "first", whereas bringing a feature to market at an affordable price or perfecting its performanc; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00412.html (10,175 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]