Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ARRL\s+Reviews\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ARRL\s+Reviews\s*$/: 71 ]

Total 71 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: k9ot@mhtc.net (Paul DeWitte K9OT); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 12:01:01 -0500; I think you guys have lost sight of who pays the big bills at ARRL advertizing. Now how would you write your report? would you offend a big spender or a little one, regardless of how the lab tests tu; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00309.html (7,465 bytes)
2. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:29:21 -0400; Are we discussing Ten Tec or descending into mindless and factless League bashing? I think you guys have lost sight of who pays the big bills at ARRL advertizing. Now how would you write your report?; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00310.html (8,327 bytes)
3. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: jmalloy@hamilton.edu (Joe Malloy); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:24:34 -0400; I think you can pretty much tell the opinion of the ARRL's staff, both technical and non, by reading reviews both literally and "between the lines". Actually, they write reviews pretty much like I wr; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00311.html (8,596 bytes)
4. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: mandolinist@interlync.com (Gary Smith); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:05:31 -0500; This sounds right to me. I had to let an employee go who was a minority. They were never able to work fast enough to do their share of the work and both my patients & I suffered for it. I did my bes; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00313.html (9,743 bytes)
5. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: ny9h@arrl.net (Bill Steffey NY9H); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:20:37 -0500; MINDLESS & FACTLESS ?????!!!! If you know how to read the noise graphs and the rest of the specs, you can get a sense of the radio, but don't expect Hey "It's a looser". When I was selling consumer a; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00316.html (9,740 bytes)
6. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:42:15 -0400; I see. So because the commercial consumer audio products magazines never write critical reviews in order to not hurt the advertisers; and the ARRL sells ad space in QST; therefore ARRL doesn't write; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00317.html (11,312 bytes)
7. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:56:40 -0600; Bill, I guess you're right. I guess we can read between the lines of a review to get the real scoop. And as you say, this is where a picture is worth a thousand... you know. Pictures as in photograph; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00318.html (9,127 bytes)
8. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:14:36 -0500; I agree ... which makes me ponder "IF" the Orion will get a fair review ... FACT: The ARRL Review on the VL-1000 'forgot' to mention that the final PA transistors ... are no longer being made ... FAC; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00319.html (8,857 bytes)
9. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:17:25 -0500; Suddenly, I'm reminded why I unsubscribed from here months ago and never missed it.....here's another opportunity... adios! dale, kg5u; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00320.html (7,898 bytes)
10. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 18:29:46 -0400; In my opinion, the only unbiased and revealing product reviews came from the ARRL's Rus Healy and Dave Newkirk during the early to mid '90s.....neither of which are employed by the League today. -Pau; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00322.html (9,945 bytes)
11. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: shortwave@pghmail.com (Bill Golden); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 20:40:33 -0400; Upon confirming that this indeed is the Ten Tec reflector, despite so many messages which appear to indicate the contrary, I've reached the same conclusion as Dale, KG5U. Time to say "adios" to a lar; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00328.html (10,449 bytes)
12. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:43:51 -0700 (PDT); It seems that most of the distrust and disillusionment of the ARRL reviews is centered on the reviewer?s comments. So how about having reviews that are nothing but cold hard laboratory measurements,; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00329.html (8,276 bytes)
13. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 20:58:47 -0400; Bla bla etc. Sheeesh...It would have taken a lot less effort to just type "unsubscribe". I'm headed to the shack now and plan to use my BLACK Omni C, one of the best CW rigs ever made and which is co; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00331.html (8,096 bytes)
14. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 21:40:16 -0400; Yes, wasn't his soliloquy wonderful? (yawn) w8au; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00335.html (7,964 bytes)
15. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: dufferjames@hotmail.com (James Duffer); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 20:54:37 -0500; Isn't this the easy way out? Just maybe some wise leadership is needed to show the mindless masses the error of their ways. This reminds me of a two meter repeater whose long time users would just ke; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00336.html (9,852 bytes)
16. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:41:21 -0400; Speaking as someone who designs products, complaints are the single most important mechanism in learning what people actually desire and finding actual design problems. Without complaints about pane; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00378.html (8,652 bytes)
17. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:21:31 -1000; Maybe that is why the hobby of amateur astronomy, and deep sky observing with rather large (for amateur use) telescopes has grown so dramatically the last 10 years or so. Just try to obtain a new, l; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00387.html (8,708 bytes)
18. [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@embarqmail.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:55:38 -0400; I thought the list might want to look at this as it puts several rigs ahead of the Orion 2 in 2khz BDR. Toby W4CAK Hello, Today I made a new layout of the ARRL/QST Product Reviews overview: http://ww; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00217.html (6,871 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Haigwood" <jerry@w5jh.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:03:54 -0500; Hans, What is impressive is the lower cost Kenwood TS590S. It is in the all "green." And, no I don't own any Kenwoods. Wish I did! Jerry W5JH I thought the list might want to look at this as it puts; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00218.html (8,195 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: "Don Jones" <ko7i@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:36:04 -0700; This is the most useful bit of info that has come across my computer's screen in the past few months. 73, Don Jones Arlington, WA I thought the list might want to look at this as it puts several rigs; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00219.html (7,488 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]