Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ARRL\s+product\s+review\s+test\s+change\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ARRL\s+product\s+review\s+test\s+change\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] ARRL product review test change (score: 1): Author: dslosty@pipeline.com (dslosty); Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:53:18 -0400; I don't know if this has been mentioned on the reflector but I found the changes announced in July's QST interesting. The League is now going to use a 5KHz standard spacing versus the former 20 KHz s; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00239.html (8,462 bytes)
2. [TenTec] ARRL product review test change (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 20:44:47 -0700 (PDT); I would like to see the ARRL add a product review test where they show the audio output spectrum of the RX audio passband with a 50-ohm load on the RX input. With today's digitally based radios (DSP; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00246.html (11,385 bytes)
3. [TenTec] ARRL product review test change (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:14:16 -0700; Darn good point! I agree. Bob K4TAX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tente; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00247.html (12,515 bytes)
4. [TenTec] ARRL product review test change (score: 1): Author: jmerrill1@adelphia.net (John L Merrill); Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 06:09:13 -0400; If you can't hear it under normal circumstances and it doesnt affect reception, I wouldnt worry about it. I see it in my Pegasus too, but it has yet to cause interfernce to anything when I've been op; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00248.html (13,075 bytes)
5. [TenTec] ARRL product review test change (score: 1): Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 06:34:32 -0400; Good suggestion. It would also be nice to see how flat the passband is and how extended it is in the bass and treble in ssb. As far as flatness is concerned, my understanding is that the passband rip; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00249.html (8,869 bytes)
6. [TenTec] ARRL product review test change (score: 1): Author: jcox@digitalexp.com (Jim Cox); Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 08:54:13 -0500; If you have to turn the volume up 100 percent to hear it, why worry about it? How many of us run our radios at 100 percent volume? I bet if you ran your car at 100 percent you'll hear some strange no; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00250.html (12,915 bytes)
7. [TenTec] ARRL product review test change (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3)); Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:27:54 -0600; Hi, Everybody, An interesting discussion. Practically, I can understand those who say they don't care about a spurious tone in the audio output that is so far down that it cannot interfere with norma; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00251.html (14,327 bytes)
8. [TenTec] ARRL product review test change (score: 1): Author: billames@erols.com (Bill Ames); Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:20:16 -0400; I think we have a catch 22 here. I am sure that the quality (and sensitivity) of spectrum analyzers will always be better then any receiver. As you spend more money for a receiver you can just spend; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00253.html (16,851 bytes)
9. [TenTec] ARRL product review test change (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:43:36 -0700; Al: You are absolutely correct. I wish the other folks understood this fact. 73 Bob K4TAX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative request; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00255.html (15,827 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]